Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-3535994Dept. of Justice

UTA non-prosecution agreement letter

Date
April 4, 2017
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
dc-3535994
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice JOHN W. HUBER United States Attorney District of Utah Of?ce of the United States Attorney (801 524?5682 I 11 South Main Street. Suite 1800 (800) 949?9451 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Fax: (801) 524-3399 April 4, 2017 Samuel Alba, Esq. Max D. Wheeler, Esq. SNOW CHRISTENSEN MARTINEAU Attorneys for Utah Transit Authority 10 Exchange Place, 11th Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: Non-Prosecution Agreement Utah Transit Authority Dear Counsel: On the conditio

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice JOHN W. HUBER United States Attorney District of Utah Of?ce of the United States Attorney (801 524?5682 I 11 South Main Street. Suite 1800 (800) 949?9451 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Fax: (801) 524-3399 April 4, 2017 Samuel Alba, Esq. Max D. Wheeler, Esq. SNOW CHRISTENSEN MARTINEAU Attorneys for Utah Transit Authority 10 Exchange Place, 11th Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: Non-Prosecution Agreement Utah Transit Authority Dear Counsel: On the condition that Utah Transit Authority ful?lls its obligations under this agreement (?Agreement?), UTA will not be a target of any federal investigation by the United States Attorney?s Of?ce for the District of Utah (?this Of?ce?) and this Of?ce will not bring any criminal action against UTA for any conduct relating to the ongoing investigation including, but not limited to, operation of mass public transit services, application for federal grants and funding, expenditure and use of federal funds, or the negotiation for, and/ or acquisition of, real property, equipment and other capital improvements related to operations. In addition, this Of?ce and the U.S. Department of Transportation?s Of?ce of Inspector General con?rm that no referral has been made to the Federal Transit Administration for civil debarment or suspension action against UTA. This ?Agreement? applies only to conduct that occurred prior to April 3, 2017. In August 2014, the State of Utah?s Of?ce of Legislative Auditor released an audit (Legislative Audit?) of UTA. The Legislative Audit identi?ed several areas Where the lack of adequate institutional controls and oversight led to problematic actions taken by UTA. Based on information learned from the Legislative Audit and the on~going investigation, UTA recognized the need for improved institutional conformity with ?nancial and ethical requirements and acknowledges the following issues and concerns (the ?four core issues?) focused on during the investigation: Inadequate controls over federal funds and drawdowns from federal grants; Improper handling and disclosure of property acquisition and disposition, including inadequate oversight of transit-oriented development projects; (0) Non?compliance With ethical standards, resulting in bene?ts to UTA employees . and/or Board members; and Improper approval of executive bonuses. UTA has put forth efforts to rectify the four core issues, including a number of reforms as outlined in the October 4, 2016, letter to this Of?ce (attached as Attachment A), and will continue to monitor its reforms to ensure continued compliance. This Agreement does not constitute an admission of criminal or civil liability by UTA, but is a demonstration of willingness to cooperate in good faith with the ongoing investigation and to facilitate its earliest possible conclusion. This Agreement applies to all federal criminal offenses related to the four core issues. This Agreement applies to UTA only. This Agreement does not apply to any other entities nor to any individuals, including present and former board members, of?cers, employees, contractors, and consultants. It is understood that UTA shall: completely disclose to this Of?ce all relevant facts it learns about regarding individual criminal misconduct of any UTA personnel acting within their of?cial capacity and identify all individuals of whom UTA learns are involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue, regardless of their position, status or seniority. UTA will use its best efforts to learn of such acts and will provide information to this Of?ce if any are found. cooperate fully with this Of?ce, and any other law enforcement agency designated by this Of?ce, with respect to the ongoing investigation or compliance with the terms of this Agreement; (0) at this Of?ce?s request, use its best efforts to secure the attendance and truthful statements or testimony of any current UTA board member, of?cer, employee, contractor, and consultant at any meeting, interview, grand jury hearing, trial, or court proceeding; use its best efforts to provide this Of?ce, upon request, any document, record, or other tangible evidence relating to matters or conduct about which this Of?ce or any designated law enforcement agency inquires that relates to the ongoing investigation of UTA or compliance with this Agreement; to the extent known by UTA, bring to this Of?ce?s attention all criminal conduct by or criminal investigations of UTA, including any of its present and former board members, of?cers, employees, contractors, and consultants that come to the attention of board members, chief of?cers, or senior managerial employees; continue to implement the institutional reforms outlined in counsel?s October 4, 2016, letter to this Of?ce, focusing in particular on those reforms intended to address the four core issues; waive the Attomey?Client and Work Product privilege with respect to all documents or information requested, subpoenaed, or that UTA is obligated to disclose or secure under paragraphs (0) and above during the investigation, along with the subject matters covered by those documents and requests (the ?waiver?). UTA has previously asserted claims of Attorney?Client and Work Product privilege over many documents subpoenaed during the investigation. As part of its cooperation throughout the investigation, UTA voluntarily offered and agreed to the waiver under this Agreement, Without any suggestion or prompting by this Of?ce. The waiver shall include previously asserted privilege claims with respect to those documents. This waiver expressly excludes any privileged communications with, or work product generated by or under the direction of, outside counsel UTA retained in its defense during the present investigation; retain a monitor, under the terms described in Attachment B, to ensure the COntinued implementation of institutional improvements outlined in counsel?s October 4, 2016, letter to this Of?ce, focusing in particular on those reforms intended to address the four core issues, as well as recommendations by the monitor concerning additional reforms intended to address the four core issues. With the exception of the hiring of a monitor, which shall expire after a period of 36 months from retention (or sooner as provided in Attachment B), this Agreement and obligations hereunder shall remain in effect for a term of either 36 months from the date this Agreement is executed, or the date upon which all prosecutions, if any, arising out of the four core issues are ?nal, whichever is later. It is understood that should UTA violate or fail to comply with any provision of this Agreement, UTA may thereafter be subject to prosecution for any federal violation of which this Of?ce has knowledge. Furthermore, it is understood that should UTA violate or fail to comply with any provision of this Agreement, UTA may be subject to suspension, debarment, or other civil sanctions. It is understood that if it is determined that UTA has violated this Agreement, then all statements made and documents provided by UTA or its of?cers, directors, employees, or agents (collectively, representatives?) to this Of?ce, OIG, or other designated law enforcement agents, and any testimony given by UTA representatives in any related proceeding, whether prior to or subsequent to the signing of this Agreement, and any leads from such statements or testimony, may be admissible in evidence in any debarment or civil sanction proceeding brought against UTA. It is further understood that this Agreement does not bind any federal, state, or local prosecuting authority other than this Of?ce. This Of?ce will, however, bring the cooperation of UTA to the attention of other prosecuting and/or investigative of?cers if requested by UTA. With respect to this matter, from the date of the signing of this Agreement forward, the Agreement supersedes all prior understandings, promises and/or conditions related to the ongoing investigation, if any, between this Of?ce and UTA. No additional promises, agreements or conditions have been entered into other than those set forth in this letter, and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. Sincerely, -- JO . HUBER United States Attorney STEWART YOUNG Assistant United States tto ey AGREED AND CONSENTED TO: @?Ld?bd New? an Wen Robert McKinley, Chairman of Board Date 4-4-17 President and CEO of UTA Date Ok?l Jayme Blg?esley, General Counsel, UTA Date APPROVED: ,4 z? . .mefl?lg'wif 1/ 2" Samuel Alba, Esq. Date Attorney for UTA if 1 Max D. Wheeler, Esq. Date Attorney for UTA

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01692476

0p
Court UnsealedJan 8, 2021

Deutsche Bank DPA

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - against - DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Cr. No. 20-00584 (RPK) (RML) DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Defendant Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (the “Company”), pursuant to authority granted by the Company’s Management Board reflected in Attachment B, an

64p
Court UnsealedMar 17, 2016

Usg-Lavabit-Unsealed

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia - (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-sw-00522-CMH-1 Case title: USA v. In Re: Information Associated Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Date Terminated: 03/24/2015 with [Redacted] Assigned to: District Judge Claude M. Hilton Appeals court case number: 13-4625 Defendant (1) In Re: Information Associated with [Redacted] TERMINATED: 03/24/2015 Pending Counts Disposition None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts Disposition None

560p
Dept. of JusticeJul 22, 2021

Deferred prosecution agreement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. FIRSTENERGY CORP., Defendant. CASE NO. ____________ JUDGE BLACK DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT The United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio (“USAO-SDOH” or “government”) and the Defendant, FirstEnergy Corp., by its undersigned representative and counsel, pursuant to the authority granted by the Board of Directors, agree as follows: 1. Criminal Information

49p
Court UnsealedJan 8, 2019

Indictment (Sealed)

Indictment (Sealed), USA v. Veselnitskaya, No. 1:18-cr-00904-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan 8, 2019)

19p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01693896

100p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.