Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-4375247Court Unsealed

Jane Doe 1

Date
February 9, 2018
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-4375247
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case Document 57-2 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit 2 Case Document 57-2 Filed 02/02/17 Page 2 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANE DOE I, JANE DOE II, and CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-14876 JANE DOE VERSUS JUDGE BARBIER JUANA MARINE-LOMBARD, in her of?cial capacity as Commissioner, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBY Louisiana Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF JANE DOE I I, Jane Doe I, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case Document 57-2 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit 2 Case Document 57-2 Filed 02/02/17 Page 2 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANE DOE I, JANE DOE II, and CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-14876 JANE DOE VERSUS JUDGE BARBIER JUANA MARINE-LOMBARD, in her of?cial capacity as Commissioner, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBY Louisiana Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF JANE DOE I I, Jane Doe I, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct: 1. I am over 18 years of age and competent to give testimony in this matter. 2. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration. 3. I am a resident of New Orleans, Louisiana, I am twenty (20) years old, and I am a woman. 4. I work as an erotic dancer in New Orleans, Louisiana. I began working as an erotic dancer at age eighteen (18). 5. Prior to my work as an erotic dancer, I helped care for my disabled mother. I also worked multiple retail jobs that required me to work between 90-120 hours per week to meet my ?nancial obligations. 6. As an erotic dancer in New Orleans, Louisiana, I set my own work schedule. I highly value the scheduling control the vocation allows me, and I enjoy expressing myself through dancing. PD.20449794.1 Case Document 57-2 Filed 02/02/17 Page 3 of 3 7. As an erotic dancer in New Orleans, Louisiana, I can earn enough money to meet my ?nancial obligations and put a portion of my income into a Simpli?ed Employee Pension Individual Retirement Account I was unable to save for retirement prior to working as an erotic dancer. 8. I feel very comfortable with the staff, servers, and entertainers with whom I work as an erotic dancer in New Orleans. I, along with customers, entertainers, and other employees, are subject to security monitoring via camera and security personnelenforced, I will no longer be permitted to engage in erotic dancing, and at that time, will not be allowed to express myself through dance, nor will I have the flexible schedule I currently have as an erotic dancer. If Act No. 395 is enforced, I will not be able to meet my ?nancial obligations, and I will not be able to save for retirement. I will be forced to move to a State where I am not prohibited from expressing myself through my desired professional employmentenforced, I and other similarly-situated entertainers will be at an increased risk from pimps, prostitutes, and traf?ckers. On the streets of New Orleans, I have witnessed pimps and prostitutes attempt to use Act No. 395?s age restrictions to recruit entertainers who are now lawfully employed, but who will lose their jobs as a result of the Act. II. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this I ?7 day of NovemberPD.20449794.1

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.