Jane Doe 3
Summary
Case Document 57-4 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit 4 Case Document 57-4 Filed 02/02/17 Page 2 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANE DOE I. JANE DOE II and CIV DOE IL ACTION N0. 16-14876 VERSUS JUDGE BARBIER JUANA MARINE-LOMBARD, in her of?cial capacity as Combsiouer, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBY Louisiana Of?ce of Alcohol and Tobacco Control DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 1. Jane Doe declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correc
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Jane Doe Lawsuit
Case 1:17-cv-01597 Document 1 Filed 08/09/17 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3, JANE DOE 4, and JANE DOE 5, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as ) President of the United States; JAMES N. ) MATTIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of ) Defense; JOSEPH F. DUNFORD, JR., in his ) official capacity as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs ) of Staff; the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF THE ARMY;
Jane Doe Suit
. Suite 800 lrvme, California 92612 Telenhnne' (949) 252-9990 MANLY, STEWART FINALDI 19100 Von Karman Ave JOHN MANLY, Esq. (State Bar NO. 149080)- VINCE w. FINALDI, Esq. (State Bar NO. 238279) ALEX E. CUNNY (State Bar NO. 291567) JANE E. REILLEY (State Bar NO. 314766) MANLY, STEWART FINALDI 19100 Von Karman Ave., Suite 800 Irvine, CA 92612 . Telephone: (949) 252-9990 Fax: (949) 252-9991 FELED l'f rn'ta Su erior Court of Ca 1?0 pCountv of Les Anoe es MM 212013 RONALD T. LABRIOLA (Stat
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 295 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2015 Page 1 of 18
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 295 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2015 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER A few days ago, on January 21, 2015, the plaintiffs' lawyers filed Plaintiffs' Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the Plaintiffs quote from a 2007 plea and settlement negotiation letter that Epstein's defense lawyers sent to the government. The quote, in its entirety, is five or six words. The quote is redacted from the public filing but it is obvious that the quoted language is but a few words, not even a complete sentence. The le
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 255 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2014 Page 1 of 5
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 255 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2014 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON THE INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Intervenors' Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). This matter is fully briefed and is now ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the briefs and is fully advised in the premises. For the reasons stated below, the Motion (DE 247) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Background This action is brought by the alleged victims ("victims" or "petitioners') of sexual crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The victims allege that the United States Attorney violated their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"), and are seeking relief stemming from the alleged violation
Jane Doe
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT In re Petition for Judicial Waiver of Parental Notice and Consent or Consent Only to Termination of Pregnancy. __________________________ JANE DOE, Appellant. No. 2D22-51 January 18, 2022 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.147 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jared E. Smith, Judge. Rinky S. Parwani of Parwani Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. CASANUEVA, Judge. 2 Jane Doe,1 a minor, challenges the final order dismissing her
MPD Jane Doe settlement
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MILWAUKEE COUNTY BRANCH 22 JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. Case. No.: 20-CV-5830 CITY OF MILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL. Defendants. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT On this 2nd day of February, 2021, the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, and the Defendants, the City of Milwaukee Police Department, Acting Chief of Police Michael Brunson, Retired Chief of Police Alfonso Morales, and the City of Milwaukee, hereby agree as follows: 1. The Plaintiff agrees to move to dismiss the above-e
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.