Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-5805800Court Unsealed

Illinois Conviction Integry Unit

Date
April 9, 2019
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-5805800
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Letter from private investigator Bill Clutter to Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul proposing a statewide 'conviction integrity unit' to investigate convicts' claims of innocence.

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Our members are devoted to freeing the innocent 1 West Old State Capitol Plaza, Ste. 818 f-?lb a: Springfield, IL 6270] April 8, 2019 Kwame Raoul Illinois Attorney General 500 South Second Street Spring?eld, Illinois 62704 Re: Proposal for a state-wide conviction integrity unit Dear Attorney General, I am seeking your support for legislation that will help provide a fairer system of justice for innocent men and women who have been wrongfully convicted and who remain in prison today. Conviction integrity units have been established in places like Dallas County, Texas, by elected prosecutors, and is becoming a growing trend in larger cities like New York City, Baltimore and now Chicago. However, in smaller counties, like Sangamon County, the cost of creating conviction integrity units, along with the low volume of such claims, make it impractical for State?s Attorneys to establish truly independent reviews of actual innocence claims. The remedy to this, I am advocating for the establishment of a state-wide conviction integrity unit within the Illinois Attorney General?s Of?ce. I was seated next to Randy Steidl in the senate gallery in January 201 I, when you had him stand and you declared it was because of cases like Randy Steidl that we needed to abolish the death penalty in Illinois. But Randy may have been home sooner, along with scores of others like him, had there been an independent conviction integrity unit examining the merits of actual innocence claims. I have drafted a proposal that I am submitting for your review and welcome your input to craft a bill that will win majority support in the House and Senate that can be sent on to the Governor to become enacted into law. As a ?rst step, as a pilot program, I am calling on you, as Illinois Attorney General, to conduct an independent review and investigation of Thomas McMillen?s claim of actual innocence that is presently pending before the Illinois Prisoner Review Board. I am enclosing a copy of Mr. McMillen?s petition, and request the resources of your office to seek justice in this case. am We!? nnmag? llama Bama? autumn-cumin During the course of my investigation, 1 discovered potential Brady violations that involve undisclosed bene?ts and favors that were given to one of the ?ve jail house, Dexter Huddleston, who testi?ed at the trial of Thomas McMillen. Enclosed is a summary that includes Huddleston?s disclosure that he was allowed sexual contact with his ?ance at the courthouse as part of the undisclosed bene?ts he was given by prosecutors. Last fall, Illinois passed the nation?s strongest jailhouse informant bill into law. According the national Innocence Project, ?Jailhouse informants are a leading cause of wrongful convictions nationally, playing a role in 16 percent of DNA-based exonerations of innocent Americans." In Illinois, 17" people were wrongfully convicted based on unreliable jailhouse informant testimony. I am asking that your of?ce prepare an independent evaluation of this case for Governor Pritzker?s consideration as he decides whether to grant clemency. Mr. McMillen, along with co-defendant Gary Edgington, are serving life sentences for ?rst degree murder convictions that originated out of Sangamon County. They faced the death penalty at trial, but the jury had residual doubt and failed to impose a death sentence. However, had they received a death sentence, like Randy Steidl did, both McMillcn and Edgington would have had post?conviction resources that would have allowed them to investigate their claims innocence much sooner. MeMillen and Edgington?s convictions hinged on the testimony of a man named Donald Johnston, who was originally facing the death penalty for the murder of Melissa Koontz after he falsely confessed to her murder. Johnston had an IQ of S4, and had the court known this at the time of trial, he may have been declared incompetent to testify. His statements and story changed by the hour, and over the course of several days of interrogation, rife with inconsistencies, and with a description of events that defy logic or plausibility. (See attached Summary of Donald ohnston?s Pre-Trial Statements). Key witnesses were never called by defense counsel for either McMillen or Edgington. One witness who we interviewed described seeing Melissa Koontz?s vehicle slow to a stop at the spot where the killer abandoned her car. This witness, Ann nx?kfa Manning, if her statement had been known to defense counsel, that testimony would have persuaded a jury that Donald Johnston?s trial testimony claiming that he, McMillen, and Edgington stood in the middle of a busy country road and flagged down Melissa Koontz?s car, was a lie. In the interest of justice, I am asking your of?ce to conduct an independent review and investigation and to report these ?ndings to Governor Pritzker. Sincerely, Bill Clutter Conviction Integrity Unit The Illinois Attorney General shall have the authority to establish a state-wide Conviction Integrity Unit consisting of a full-time staff of lawyers and investigators to review and investigate the merits of a claim of actual innocence made by an inmate of the Illinois Department of Corrections that is filed pursuant to the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act 725 ILCS 5fl22?l in all counties other than Cook. 1) Once a prima fascia finding is made by the Conviction Integrity Unit that a claim has merit to warrant further review, the Attorney General shall enter its appearance on behalf of the People ofthe State of Illinois in further post?conviction proceedings; 2) The Conviction Integrity Unit shall be given notice of any post-conviction motions filed on behalf of any inmate who is requesting post?conviction forensic testing pursuant to 725 ILCS and shall have authority to enter agreed orders with the circuit courts to order such testing that may help establish evidence of actual innocence; 3} The Conviction Integrity Unit of the Illinois Attorney General shall seek justice in such cases where the weight of new evidence undermines confidence in the original criminal conviction.

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionApr 2, 2022

USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: Central to our system of justice is a defendant’s right to have guilt adjudged by a lay jury of one’s peers. Citizens give their time and attention to this critical role in the administration of justice, a role which is enshrined in our Constitution. Judicial officers are charged with t

40p
Court UnsealedEmailUnknown

email: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 135 Filed 05/04/21

Sophia Papapetru, Staff Attorney at the Federal Bureau of Prisons, emails Judge Nathan NYSD Chambers regarding the acceptance of an external hard drive from defense counsel in the US v Maxwell case. The MDC Brooklyn initially had restrictions on accepting external hard drives but has agreed to accept it from defense counsel without needing a court order. The MDC will coordinate with defense counsel for the delivery.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionNov 19, 2013

Pilot motion

Case 4:13-cv-00250-JMM Document 34 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NATIONAL TRUCKING FINANCIAL RECLAMATION SERVICES, LLC, BRUCE TAYLOR, EDIS TRUCKING, INC., JERRY FLOYD, MIKE CAMPBELL, PAUL OTTO, TOWNES TRUCKING, INC., R&R TRANSPORTATION, INC., OHIO AUTO DELIVERY, INC., and EAGLE MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. PILOT CORPORATION, PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC D/

39p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00023059

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01718407

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028425

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.