Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-6184722Dept. of Justice

Order to Unseal Indictment

Date
July 8, 2019
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
dc-6184722
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Order to Unseal Indictment, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 8, 2019)

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case Document 3 Filed 07/08/19 Page 1 of 1 -- ME 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Unsealing Order v. 19 Cr. 490 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Upon the application of the United States, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, by Assistant United? States Attorney Alex Rossmiller; I It is found that the Indictment in the above-captioned case is currently sealed and the United States Attorney?s Of?ce has applied to have that Indictment unsealed, and it is therefore: ORDERED that the Indictment in the above-captioned action be unsealed and remain unsealed pending further order of the Court. Dated: New York, New York July 8, 2019 HENRY PITMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK r: . um?. Wu SONY 1 DOCUMENT 03 mm l-an

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJul 15, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 15, 2019)

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Display Name

Display Name Email UUID 6ICE9350-0B4F-0000-AB39-E8Of'2A59A443 Distribution 'I've TO Recipient Type SysternGroupMember Recipient Display Name Email IRA D 9D77B2D0-19C1-0000-A9894Y2C00000S8D0 Distribution Type TO Recipient Tvpc SystemGroupkkmber Recipient Display Name Email _ U LID 4237CDC0-1407-0000-AF20-8402120084D2 Distribution Type TO Recipient Type _Recipient Display Name a Email UUID 66E64C10-1320-0000-8ECI-2F2162868DCC Distribution Type TO Recipient Txpe SystemGroupMember Expire 0 Delay delivers until 0 Delegated fake Archived fake Read fake Deleted fake Opened fake Completed fake Security Normal Box type Inbox Return notification hen opened fake Return notification "hen deleted fake Return notification when completed fake Return notification %%hen declined fake Return notification "hen accepted false Archive S'en ion 5.3 Internal ID 5D4F0066.NYMDOMLNYMADMI.100.16B6F30.1.F EAE. [email protected] LNY MADM 1.103.0.1.0.141

1000p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01262863

0p
Court UnsealedAug 19, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2019)

3p
Dept. of JusticeFeb 27, 2025

u.s. v. jeffrey epstein indictment

UNTTED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICR OF NEW YORK ONTTED STATES OF AMERICA © | INDICTWEw® | -v. - : 19 Cr. amrEREY EPSTEIN, : 19CRIM 490 Defendant. : eee cone oe OE... SO The Grand Jury charges: overview 1. As set forth herein, over the course of many years, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida, among other locations. 2. In particular, from at least in or about 2002, up to and i

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.