Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-6199164Court Unsealed

Doe Jane II v Epstein

Date
July 15, 2019
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-6199164
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, ?52:96am vs. EPSTEIN, an" A RAH KELLEN, Defendants. 1 \l 80$ 1ch 0 Til" ?301 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, hereby sues JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states: JURISDICTION AND VENUE This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000, exclusive of interests and costs. Venue is proper in this Court as all acts occurred in Palm Beach County and all par

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, ?52:96am vs. EPSTEIN, an" A RAH KELLEN, Defendants. 1 \l 80$ 1ch 0 Til" ?301 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, hereby sues JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states: JURISDICTION AND VENUE This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000, exclusive of interests and costs. Venue is proper in this Court as all acts occurred in Palm Beach County and all parties reside and/0r do business herein. PARTIES 4. Ms. DOE II is a natural person residing in Palm Beach County, Florida. During the events giving rise to this claim, she was a minor but has now reached majority. 5. Defendant EPSTEIN is a natural person who resides and/or does bu?iness in Palm Beach County, Florida, and who committed the acts alleged within the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant KELLEN is believed to reside in the State of New York, but committed the acts alleged within the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County, Florida. 6. Defendant EPSTEIN is believed to now be incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Jail for crimes committed that are related and/or similar to the claims in this case. 7. Defendant EPSTEIN was, at all times relevant to this action, a part time resident of Palm Beach, Florida. All acts complained of herein occurred at his estate residence in Palm Beach, Florida. 8. Defendant EPSTEIN has a history of enticing young women, under the age of consent, to private sessions that begin with massages and evolve, through his acts of solicitation by use of his lavish wealth, into sexual encounters, wherein Defendant EPSTEIN ful?lls sexual fantasies by using said young women. 9. Defendant EPSTEIN, in agreement with two (2) persons he employed for this purpose, HALEY ROBSON and Defendant KELLEN, conspired with these other two Defendants to solicit young women of the type Defendant EPSTEIN preferred, blonde, attractive in appearance, and younger than the age of legal consent, to provide sexual grati?cation for him. 10. Defendants EPSTEIN and KELLEN entered into a'criminal conspiracy to solicit young women for acts of prostitution, including the Plaintiff. 11. From about June or July, 2008 until February, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN and KELLEN solicited the Plaintiff to come to Defendant home and provide ?massages? for him. Defendant EPSTEIN corrupted young girls, such as Plaintiff, into engaging in sexual acts to designed to ful?ll his unnatural sexual desires for young women or even younger girls who were under the age of consent. These acts included his requests that he wanted the encounter to be like a ?porn video.? Defendant EPSTEIN would script lines for Plaintiff to say, including calling out his name and requesting that he perform a certain sexual act ?harder,?while he touched the Plaintiffs vagina with a vibrator or with his ?ngers; alternately, he would masturbate in the presence of the Plaintiff after demanding her to disrobe and walk in front of him in provocative sexual poses. - 12. Defendant EPSTEIN touched Plaintiff vagina, or penetrated Plaintiffs vagina, using his ?ngers and/or a vibrator on multiple occasions, during the time that Plaintiff was a minor. COUNT I: SEXUAL BATTERY 13. Plaintiff reasserts and alleges, as if fully set forth in Count I, the allegations of 111] 1-12, ?1_1P_f? l4. Defendant EPSTEIN unlawfully touched the Plaintiff without Plaintiff? consent, and before she reached the age of consent, with the intention of bringing about a harmful and offensive contact. 15. As a direct and proximate result of said unlawful touching, plaintiff suffered physical injuries, severe emotional distress, mental anguish and distress, humiliation and embarrassment and continues to suffer so today. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court: A. Award Plaintiff compensatory damages for humiliation, loss of reputation, mental anguish and pain and suffering; and B. Award Plaintiff her costs of this action. COUNT II: CIVIL CONSPIRACY 16. Plaintiff reasserts and alleges, as if fully set forth in Count I, the allegations of 1111 1-12, supra. 17. Defendants entered into a criminal conspiracy to solicit young women for the sexual grati?cation of Defendant EPSTEIN, including, but not limited to, soliciting the Plaintiff and others like her for him to exploit and take advantage of their youth, inexperience and ?nancial need. 18. As a direct and proximate result of said unlawful touching, plaintiff suffered physical injuries, severe emotional distress, mental anguish and distress, humiliation and embarrassment and continues to suffer so today. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff reSpectfully requests that this Court: A. Award Plaintiff compensatory damages for humiliation, loss of reputation, mental anguish and pain and suffering; and B. Award Plaintiff her costs of this action. PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL ON ALL ISSUES SO TRIABLE. Dated: ?3.100? Respectfully submitted, 1513536 M. Florida Bar No.. 437883 GARCIA, ELKINS BOEHRINGER, PA. 224 Datura St., Ste. 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561)832-8033 Telecopier: (561) 832-7137 E-mail: isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF Page: 1 I PALM BEACH CTY CIR CT JISPROD Receipt Nomber: CAMB227404 Date: Cashier: DLAFFERTY Payor: ISIDRO MANUEL GARCIA Addr: 224 DATURA ST #900 THE HARVEY BUILDING WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 Violation/Docket Description Amount Case: 2008CA020614 - JANE DOE II JEFFREY EPSTEIN Party: JANE DOE II CAFF 236.00 CAFF 20.00 CHECK RECEIVED GENERAL ACCT -256.00 Total Fees: 256.00 Total Payment: 256.00

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJul 15, 2019

Doe Jane v Epstein

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA JANE DOE, by and through JANE MOTHER as parent and natural guardian, Plaintiffs, 9: CO is? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, HALEY ROBSON, 2'5; 0" and SARAH KELLEN, 32% ?a 31; a ?i -?vr if} 4* LA Defendants. - Pg}; 5 In: (.0 COMPLAINT Plaintiffs,iJANE DOE, by and through JANE MOTHER as parent and natural guardian Of JANE DOE, bring this Complaint against Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, HALEY ROBSON, and SARAH KELL

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
Court UnsealedApr 26, 2024

Jeffrey Epstein victims Jane Doe lawsuit vs FBI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3, JANE DOE 4, JANE DOE 5, JANE DOE 6, JANE DOE 7, JANE DOE 8, JANE DOE 9, JANE DOE 10, JANE DOE 11 and JANE DOE 12, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case No.: COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, Jane Doe 9, Jane Doe 10, Jane D

27p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.