Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-6476540Court Unsealed

Jane Doe 13

Date
October 16, 2019
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-6476540
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

1 Robert Hamparyan (State Bar No. 181934) HAMPARYAN INJURY LAWYERS, APC 2 275 W. Market Street San Diego, CA 92101 3 t. 619.550.1355 4 e. [email protected] 5 John J. O’Brien (State Bar No. 253392) THE O’BRIEN LAW FIRM, APLC 6 750 B Street, Suite 3300 San Diego, CA 92101 7 t. 619.535.5151 8 e. [email protected] 9 Brian M. Holm (State Bar No. 255691) HOLM LAW GROUP, PC 10 12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92130 11 t. 858.707.5858 12 e. [email protected] 13 Atto

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
1 Robert Hamparyan (State Bar No. 181934) HAMPARYAN INJURY LAWYERS, APC 2 275 W. Market Street San Diego, CA 92101 3 t. 619.550.1355 4 e. [email protected] 5 John J. O’Brien (State Bar No. 253392) THE O’BRIEN LAW FIRM, APLC 6 750 B Street, Suite 3300 San Diego, CA 92101 7 t. 619.535.5151 8 e. [email protected] 9 Brian M. Holm (State Bar No. 255691) HOLM LAW GROUP, PC 10 12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92130 11 t. 858.707.5858 12 e. [email protected] 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 15 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 JANE DOE NOS. 1 - 22, inclusive, individuals; Plaintiffs, v. GIRLSDOPORN.COM, a business organization, form unknown; MICHAEL J. PRATT, an individual; ANDRE GARCIA, an individual; MATTHEW WOLFE, an individual; BLL MEDIA, INC., a California corporation; BLL MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; DOMI PUBLICATIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; EG PUBLICATIONS, INC., a California corporation; M1M MEDIA, LLC, a California limited liability company; BUBBLEGUM FILMS, INC., a business organization, form unknown; OH WELL MEDIA LIMITED, a business organization, form unknown; MERRO MEDIA, INC., a California corporation; MERRO MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; and ROES 1 - 550, inclusive, Defendants. LEAD CASE: Case No.: 37-2016-00019027-CU-FR-CTL CONSOLIDATED WITH: Case No.: 37-2017-00033321-CU-FR-CTL Case No.: 37-2017-00043712-CU-FR-CTL DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 13 IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT DOMI PUBLICATION LLC’S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE [CCP §425.16] Date: Time: Judge: Location: August 31, 2018 9:00 a.m. Hon. Joel R. Wohlfeil C-73 28 DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 13 DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I, Jane Doe No. 13, declare as follows: 1. I am a plaintiff in the above-captioned action. I have personal knowledge of each fact stated in this declaration. 2. In November 2015, Defendants posted an advertisement on Craigslist.com in the gigs/modeling section, seeking young women for adult modeling. I responded to the advertisement and corresponded with defendant Andre Garcia (“GARCIA”) and defendants’ videographer going by “Ted.” Our initial conversions were via text and/or email -- the following representations regarding distribution were conveniently by phone or in-person. 3. Defendants told me that they would not post the subject video online and they would not distribute the videos in the United States. They told me the video was going to Australia - and would only be in DVD format. They had me speak with another woman, who assured me the videos do not get leaked. 4. Before the shoot, GARCIA and “Ted,” again, assured me they would not post the video online and they would not distribute the video in the United States. They assured her there was nothing to worry about, promised me privacy, and represented nobody I knew would see the videos. 5. GARCIA and “Ted” continued to make the above representations before and simultaneous with providing me documents to sign. They told me the documents were merely summing up all we had previously talked about. 6. After the video shoot, Defendants did not pay me in full, as they represented. 7. In January 2016, Defendants released my video on their website, www.girlsdoporn.com, and other websites, which were then discovered by my family, friends, and school. 8. As a result of the release of the video, I have suffered emotional distress damages (including loss of eating, loss of sleep, enduring fright, shock, nervousness, anxiety, depression, embarrassment, mortification, shame, and fear): a. I debated suicide. 28 2 DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 13 1 b. I debated leaving the country. 2 c. I had to drop out of my sorority due to the backlash of students and friends. 3 d. Strangers have stalked me online, often sending me links, pictures, and making horrible 4 comments. 5 9. 6 release my video on their website, or told me I was in danger. I would never have agreed to the video, 7 if Defendants had told me their website existed. I made a mistake trusting the Defendants – they are 8 not truthful people. 9 10. I would never have agreed to the video, if Defendants had been truthful, told me their plan to Before and during this lawsuit, I made changes to my life to minimize the harassment and other 10 damages the Defendants have caused me. In this lawsuit, I seek the Court’s help in remedying the 11 damages the Defendants have caused me. Unsealing the Court record will likely cause me even more 12 harm and the harassment may exacerbate and/or resurface. Unsealing the Court record will worsen the 13 very harm I have am seeking to now remedy. 14 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. 17 18 Date: March 7, 2017 By: _____________ Jane Doe No. 13 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 13

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.