Case File
dc-7222851Court UnsealedVirgin Islands drug warrant
Date
October 6, 2020
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-7222851
Pages
14
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 1 of 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF: iPhone 68 (SN: and Subscriber Identity Module card, . Case 0 Mg. 2020/0016 CURRENTLY LOCATED AT HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS RESIDENT AGENT IN CHARGE OFFICE, ST. CROIX, FILED UNDER SEAL USVI AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION UNDER RULE 41 FOR A WARRANT TO SEARCH AND SEIZE I, Christopher McGrath, being ?rst-duly sworn, hereby
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 1 of 14
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. CROIX
IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF:
iPhone 68 (SN: and
Subscriber Identity Module card, . Case 0 Mg. 2020/0016
CURRENTLY LOCATED AT HOMELAND
SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS RESIDENT
AGENT IN CHARGE OFFICE, ST. CROIX, FILED UNDER SEAL
USVI
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN
APPLICATION UNDER RULE 41 FOR
A WARRANT TO SEARCH AND SEIZE
I, Christopher McGrath, being ?rst-duly sworn, hereby depose and state as
follows:
INTRODUCTION AND AGENT BACKGROUND
1. I make this af?davit in support of an application under Rule 41 of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for a search warrant authorizing the
examination of property, described in Attachment A, which is currently in law
enforcement possession, and the extraction from that property of electronically
stored information described in Attachment B.
2. I am a Special Agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
Department of Homeland Security, St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands, and
have been since 2006. As a Special Agent, my duties and responsibilities include
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 2 of 14
Page 2 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
conducting investigations of: alleged manufacturing, distributing or possession of
controlled substances; Title 21, United States Code, Section 841
3. This af?davit is intended to show only that there is suf?cient probable
cause for the requested warrant and does not set forth all of my knowledge about
this matter.
IDENTIFICATION OF THE DEVICE TO BE EXAMINED
4. The property to be searched is an iPhone 68, serial number
and Subscriber Identity Module card hereinafter the
?Device?, both listed in Attachment A. The Device is currently located at
Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), Resident Agent in Charge (RAC) Of?ce,
St. CroiX, US. Virgin Islands.
5. The applied?for warrant would authorize the forensic examination of
the Device for the purpose of identifying electronically stored data particularly
described in Attachment B.
PROBABLE CAUSE
6. On March 7, 2020, at the Henry E. Rohlsen International Airport on
St. CroiX, USVI, Customs and Border Protection Of?cers (CBPO) Viveros and
Balzer conducted an examination of American Airlines (AA) ?ight 2227 destined
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 3 of 14
Page 3 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
for Miami International Airport (MIA). CBPO Viveros and Balzer were examining
checked baggage that was being loaded into the front luggage compartment of the
aircraft. CBPO Viveros removed a purple and black duf?e bag (tagged for MIA,
belonging to Vonne Bailey) that was on the ramp baggage loader belt and in the
process of being loaded into the luggage compartment.
7. As CBPO Viveros opened the duf?e bag and began to conduct a
physical inspection of the items inside the bag, he observed a neatly folded black
towel. As he proceeded to check the towel, he felt a hard, squared object. CBPO
Viveros proceeded to unfold the towel and observed two (2) black, vacuum sealed
brick shaped objects, covered in a glittery substance. One of the bricks had a
picture of former president Barack Obama. The second brick had a picture which
featured men such as Barack Obama, Martin Luther King Jr, and Malcolm X.
CBPO Balzer contacted Supervisory Customs and Border Protection Of?cer
I (SCBPO) G. Meyers and requested that she meet with her and CBPO Viveros by
the aircraft.
8. CBPO Viveros showed SCBPO Meyers the two (2) brick shaped
objects. Instructed by SCBPO Meyers, CBPO Viveros probed the bricks using a
stainless?steel knife. A white powder like substance was observed on the tip of the
knife that was used. Both bricks were then secured back in the purple and black
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 4 of 14
Page 4 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
duf?e bag and removed from the loading belt. CBPO Viveros, Balzer and SCBPO
Meyers, proceeded to the AA counter and asked for seating assignment
and asked that he be removed from the aircraft. CBPO Balzer maintained
possession of the purple duf?e bag, while CBPO Viveros and SCBPO Meyers,
approached the rear passenger loading area of the aircraft. As they did so, CBPO
Viveros observed as one of the gate agents exited the aircraft with a black male
individual with dreadlocks in a stalking cap, wearing a white short pants and a dark
colored shirt, who was later identi?ed as Mr. Vonne BAILEY (DOB 12/17/1990).
BAILEY was then escorted to the CBP secondary inspection room. During the
search of Vonne Bailey and his belongings, an iPhone 6s was discovered.
9. Through the course of my training, investigations, prior law
enforcement experience, and conversations with other law enforcement personnel,
1 am aware that it is a common practice for drug smugglers to work in concert with
other individuals and to do so by utilizing cellular telephones to maintain
communications with co?conspirators in order to further their criminal activities. I
am also aware that it is a common practice for drug smugglers to communicate
with others regarding smuggling arrangements and payment utilizing cellular
telephones. Conspiracies involving drug smuggling generate many types of
evidence including, but not limited to, cellular phone?related evidence such as
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 5 of 14
Page 5 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
voicemail messages referring to the arrangements of travel and payment, names, .
photographs, text messages, and phone numbers of co?conspirators.
10. Based upon my training and experience as a HSI Agent, consultations
with law enforcement officers experienced in drug smuggling investigations, and
all the facts and opinions set forth in this af?davit, I submit the following:
a. drug smugglers will use cellular telephones because they are mobile
and they have instant access to telephone calls, text, web, and voice messages.
b. drug smugglers will use cellular telephones because they are able to
actively monitor the progress of the drugs smuggled while they are in transit.
0. drug smugglers and their accomplices will use cellular telephones
because they can easily arrange and/or determine what time the smuggled drugs
will arrive at predetermined locatiOns.
d. drug smugglers will use cellular telephones to direct drivers and
couriers to a drop off and/or pick up time of the smuggled drugs.
e. drug smugglers will use cellular telephones to notify or warn their
accomplices of law enforcement activity including the presence and location of
marked and unmarked units, as well as the operational status of checkpoints.
f. drug smugglers will use cellular telephones to make arrangements
with the coconspirators, and to arrange for payment after the smuggling event.
10. The Device is currently in the lawful pessession of H81 pursuant to
seizure incident to arrest. Therefore, while HSI might already have all necessary
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 6 ?of 14
Page 6 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
authority to examine the Device, I seek this additional warrant out of an abundance
of caution to be certain that an examination of the Device will comply with the
Fourth Amendment and other applicable laws.
11. The Device is currently in storage at Homeland Security
Investigations (HSI), Resident Agent in Charge (RAC) Of?ce, St. Croix, US.
Virgin Islands. In my training and experience, I know that the Device has been
stored in a manner in which its contents are, to the extent material to this
investigation, in substantially the same state as they were when the. Device ?rst
came into the possession of H81.
TECHNICAL TERMS
12. Based on my training and experience, I use the following technical
terms to convey the following meanings:
a. Wireless telephone: A wireless telephone (or mobile telephone, or
cellular telephone) is a handheld wireless device used for voice and
data communication through radio signals. These telephones send
signals through networks of transmitter/receivers, enabling
communication with other Awireless telephones or traditional ?land
line? telephones. A wireless telephone usually contains a ?call log,?
which records the telephone number, date, and time of calls made to
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 7 of 14
Page 7 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
and from the phone. In addition to enabling voice communications,
wireless telephones offer a broad range of capabilities. These
capabilities include: storing names and phone numbers in electronic
?address books,? sending, receiving, and storing text messages and e?
. mail; taking, sending, receiving, and storing still photographs and
moving video; storing and playing back audio ?les; storing dates,
appointments, and other information on personal calendars; and
accessing and downloading information from the Internet. Wireless
telephones may also include global positioning system
technology for determining the location of the device.
b. Subscriber Identity Module card: A Subscriber Identity
Module (SIM) card is assigned an International Mobile Subscriber
Identity/Identi?er (IMSI) number. The IMSI number is electronically
embedded in the SIM card and identi?es the speci?c account to which
it is assigned. The SIM card is inserted into a slot in the cellular
telephone. The SIM card may be able to be removed from one cellular
telephone and used in another cellular telephone instrument. However,
even if the SIM card is removed from one telephone instrument to
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 8 of 14
Page 8 of 14
Affidavit in Support of Search Warrant
another, the IMSI number will not change. The SIM card is typically
insertedinto a slot in the cellular telephone before use.
c. GPS: A GPS navigation device uses the Global Positioning System to
display its current location. It often contains records. the locations
Where it has been. Some GPS navigation devices can give a user
driving or walking directions to another location. These devices can
contain records of the addresses or locations involved in such
navigation. The Global Positioning System (generally abbreviated
consists of 24 NAVSTAR satellites orbiting the Earth. Each
satellite contains an extremely accurate clock. Each satellite
repeatedly transmits by radio a mathematical representation of the
current time, combined with a special sequence of numbers. These
signals are sent by radio, using speci?cations that are publicly
available. A GPS antenna on Earth can receive those signals. When a
GPS antenna receives signals from at least four satellites, a computer
connected to that antenna can mathematically calculate the antenna?s
latitude, longitude, and sometimes altitude With a high level of
precision.
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 9 of 14
Page 9 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
d. PDA: A personal digital assistant, or PDA, is a handheld electronic
device used for storing data (such as names, addresses, appointments
or notes) and utilizing computer programs. Some PDAs also function
as wireless communication devices and are used to access the Internet
and send and receive e-mail. PDAs usually include a memory card or
other removable storage media for storing data and a keyboard and/or
touch screen for entering data. Removable storage media include
various types of ?ash memory cards or miniature hard drives. This
removable storage media can store any digital data. Most PDAs run
computer software, giving them many of the same capabilities as
personal computers. For example, PDA users can work with word?
processing documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. PDAS may
also include global positioning system for
determining the location of the device.
e. IP Address: An Internet Protocol address (or simply address?) is a
unique numeric address used by computers on the Internet. An IP
address is a series of feur numbers, each in the range 0?255, separated
by periods 121.56.97.178). Every computer attached to the
Internet computer must be assigned an IP address so that Internet
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 10 of 14
Page 10 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
13.
traf?c sent from and directed to that computer may be directed
properly from its source to its destination. Most Internet service
providers control a range of IP addresses. Some computers have
static?that is, long?term?IP addresses, while other computers have
dynamicmthat is, frequently changed?1P addresses.
Internet: The Internet is a global network of computers and other
electronic devices that communicate with each other. Due to the
structure of the Internet, connections between devices on the Internet
often cross state and international borders, even when the devices
communicating with each other are in the same state.
Based on my training, experience, and research, and from consulting
the manufacturer?s advertisements and product technical speci?cations available
online at know that the Device has capabilities that
allow it to serve as a wireless telephone, digital camera, portable media player,
GPS navigation device, and PDA. In my training and experience, examining data
stored on devices of this type can uncover, among other things, evidence that
. reveals or suggests who possessed or used the device.
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 11 of 14
Page 11 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
ELECTRONIC STORAGE AND FORENSIC ANALYSIS
14. Based on my knowledge, training, and experience, I know that
electronic devices can store information for long periods of time. Similarly, things
that have been viewed via the Internet are typically stored for some period of time
on the device. This information can sometimes be recovered with forensics tools.
15. Forensic evidence. As further described in Attachment B, this
application seeks permission to locate not only electronically stored information
that might serve as direct evidence of the crimes described on the warrant, but also
forensic evidence that establishes how the Device was used, the purpose of its use,
who used it, and when. There isprobable cause to believe that this forensic
electronic evidence might be en the Device because:
a. Data on the storage medium can provide evidence of a file that was
once on the storage medium but has since been deleted or edited, or of
a deleted portion of a file (such as a paragraph that has been deleted
from a word processing
b. Forensic evidence on a device can also indicate who has used or
controlled the device. This ?user attribution? evidence is analogous to.
the search for ?indicia of occupancy? while executing a search
warrant at a residence.
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 12 of 14
Page 12 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
c. A person with appropriate familiarity with how an electronic device
works may, after examining this forensic evidence in its proper
context, be able to draw conclusions about how electronic devices
were used, the purpose of their use, who used them, and when.
d. The process of identifying the exact electronically stored information
on a storage medium that is necessary to draw an accurate conclusion
is a dynamic process. Electronic evidence is not always data that can
be merely reviewed by a review team and passed along to
investigators. Whether data stored on a computer is evidence may
depend on other information stored on the computer and the
application of knowledge about how a computer behaves. Therefore,
contextual information necessary to understand other evidence also
falls within the scope of the warrant.
e. Further, in ?nding evidence of how a device was used, the purpose of
its use, who used it, and when, sometimes it is necessary to establish
that a particular thing is not present on a storage medium.
16. Nature of examination. Based on the foregoing, and consistent with
Rule the warrant I am applying for would permit the examination of
the device consistent with the warrant. The examination may require authorities to
Case: Document 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 13 of 14
Page 13 of 14
Af?davit in Support of Search Warrant
employ techniques, including but not limited to computer?assisted scans of the
entire medium, that might expose many parts of the device to human inspection in
order to determine whether it is evidence described by the warrant.
l7. Manner of execution. Because this warrant seeks only permission to
examine a device already in law enforcement?s possession, the execution of this
warrant does not involve the physical intrusion onto a premises. Consequently, I
submit there is reasonable cause for the Court to authorize execution of the warrant
at any time in the day or night.
CONCLUSION
18. I submit that this af?davit supports probable cause for a search
warrant authorizing the examination of the Device described in Attachment A to
seek the items described in Attachment B.
REQUEST FOR SEALING
19. It is respectfully requested that this Court issue an order sealing, until
further order of the Court, all papers submitted in support of this application,
including the application and search warrant. I believe that sealing this document
is necessary because the warrant is relevant to an ongoing investigation into the
criminal organizations as not all of the targets of this investigation will be searched
Case: 1:20-mj-00016-WAL-GWC Document #: 1-1 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 14 of 14
Page14of14
Affidavit in Support of Search Warrant
at this time. Based upon my training and experience, I have learned that, online
criminals actively search for criminal affidavits and search warrants via the
internet, and disseminate them to other online criminals as they deem appropriate,
i.e., post them publicly online through the carding forums. Premature disclosure of
the contents of this affidavit and related documents may have a significant and
negative impact on the continuing investigation and may severely jeopardize its
effectiveness.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Christopher McGrath
Christopher McGrath
Special Agent
Homeland Security Investigations
Subscribed and sworn to before me
on April 23 , 2020:
/s/ George W. Cannon, Jr.
GEORGE W. CANNON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Related Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.