Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00039967DOJ Data Set 9Other

London)

Cc: London) Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:34:32 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png Great. I will send it on. Best, U.S. Department of Justice Attache - London Nte United States Embassy 33 Nine Elms Lane London SWI I 7US From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesda , August 24, 2021 4:06 PM To (CRM) Cc: CRM) Subject: : n ependent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' • Please see attached written consent froM Best, ttorney. From: (CRM Sent: Thursda , Au ust 12, 2021 5:49 AM To: ) ) (USAN EFTA00039967 (CRM) =.1 Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. I. H

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00039967
Pages
4
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

Cc: London) Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:34:32 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png Great. I will send it on. Best, U.S. Department of Justice Attache - London Nte United States Embassy 33 Nine Elms Lane London SWI I 7US From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesda , August 24, 2021 4:06 PM To (CRM) Cc: CRM) Subject: : n ependent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' • Please see attached written consent froM Best, ttorney. From: (CRM Sent: Thursda , Au ust 12, 2021 5:49 AM To: ) ) (USAN EFTA00039967 (CRM) =.1 Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. I. H

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Cc: London) Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:34:32 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png Great. I will send it on. Best, U.S. Department of Justice Attache - London Nte United States Embassy 33 Nine Elms Lane London SWI I 7US From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesda , August 24, 2021 4:06 PM To (CRM) Cc: CRM) Subject: : n ependent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Please see attached written consent froM Best, ttorney. From: (CRM Sent: Thursda , Au ust 12, 2021 5:49 AM To: ) ) (USAN EFTA00039967 (CRM) =.1 Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. I. Has the witness consented to the release of the information requested? If so, please a copy of the written consent. The witness has not been asked for written consent. However, counsel for the witness has encouraged the prosecutors to seek this information. In can be inferred from the statements of counsel that the witness has consented. 2. did the witness apply to and what was the year of her application/attendance? The team was uncertain of which college (I had asked this). Is there a central office at which can be queried for all colleges? 3. How, if at all does this request relate to/impact the material witness MLA request? This request relates to the charged Maxwell case going to trial. The material witness MIA requests relates to a broader investigation. 4. What were the sentences which applied at the date of the offences (1994 — 2004), as the penalties provided with the request apply to conduct that occurred after 27 July 2006? I will check with the case team to confirm specific periods. The sentences will he greater than one year and less than life (with no death penalty involved), so is there a need to he more precise? Department oj Justice Attaché - London tiv Hdikt.,; , 4•4 United States Embassy 33 Nine Elms Lane London SW II 7US From: (CRM) Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 9:03 AM To: (U Cc CRM) Subject: RN: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators'straining relations between UK and America' You guys have a moment for a brief call this morning? The Ambassador is concerned about the attached story, and I wanted to see if you have any sense of where this is coming from. Is this coming from victims' counsel? Anyone in your shop decided to push this? EFTA00039968 The quote from the State Department yesterday in the NY Times was unhelpful (and I let them know it - I think it came from someone spouting off on the European Desk). I also had the following email from the UKCA yesterday: We are aware that a civil case has been filed in New York concerning the Epstein investigation with the material witness as the defendant. Please can you let us know what impact this has on the material witness's current status, as a witness, in the criminal investigation and in relation to the MLA request. I think they are asking whether, in light of the recent allegations, s now a suspect instead of a witness (in British parlance). I was going to respond with one wor none" but thought I should check first. I am around today whenever you can chat. The earlier the better because the Amb is keen to soft this out. Thanks, U.S. Department of Justice Attaché - London L0s4, United States Embassy 33 Nine Elms Lane London SW11 7US From this morning's Independent Fears issue over Duke of York could affect wider efforts to collaborate on high-profile legal cases. US authorities are growing increasingly frustrated with Prince Andrew's failure to cooperate into their probe into the network surrounding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, exacerbating tensions between Washington and London, The Independent understands. People familiar with authorities' investigations into Mr Epstein's business affairs told The Independent that the lack of information-sharing had caused diplomatic strain, with US law enforcement and diplomats raising the matter with their British counterparts. They said a new civil case brought by alleging the Duke of York had sexually abused her, will add further strain over the issue, along with the prosecution of Esptein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who is set to go on trial for sex trafficking charges later this year. EFTA00039969 There are fears that the issue could sour broader efforts to collaborate on high profile legal cases. The prince has consistently denied the allegations, while Ms Maxwell denies the charges against her. The lack of cooperation now spans three years of reported attempts by the US authorities to gather facts from the royal who, in a statement from 2019, said he would be willing to help US law-enforcement with investigations. However, in January last year, Manhattan US attorney Geoffrey Berman said the country's authorities had received "zero cooperation" from the prince, who no longer carries out royal duties. In June 2020, The Wall Street Journal reported that an application had been made by the Department of Justice (Dal) under a US-UK mutual legal assistance treaty in order to win cooperation from the Duke of York. This avenue has not been effective, according to sources. They contend that Prince Andrew has failed to share details of the extent of his ties to Mr Epstein, whose death in a Manhattan prison in 2019 was ruled a suicide. The extent and nature of Mr Epstein's financial network is still being explored in several jurisdictions, including the US. Of particular interest to the US authorities is how money transfers may be linked to the movement of young women and girls. The various interested bodies, including the FBI, believe these may offer insights into ongoing organised criminal operations. These probes are significant not only for legal proceedings related to Epstein, but also to ongoing investigations surrounding Ms Maxwell, who is currently in prison awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. It is also alleged that multiple authorities are seeking details of flights that the Duke of York used to visit Epstein in a range of locations, so that they can better understand how people may have travelled into and out of the disgraced financier's orbit. The authorities' interests are understood to include multiple trips by the royal to Epstein's Caribbean island, Little St James, as well as Florida and New York. Last year, prosecutors in the US Virgin Islands, which includes Little St James, alleged Mr Epstein abused hundreds of young women and girls up until 2018. The frustration over the Duke of York's lack of cooperation is said to be amplified by the fact that it appears unlikely that the royal would be extradited. His cooperation would therefore be a matter of bolstering diplomatic relations and sharing any information which could help avoid future trafficking of young women and girls. The lawyer representing Ms Mims accused the prince, who is facing the Queen after arriving at Balmoral on Tuesday, of "stonewalling" appeals for information after the 15-page lawsuit was filed in New York. The prince is the only defendant in the suit, which alleges she was "lent out for sexual purposes" by Epstein. Boies said his client ultimately wanted "vindication" from the legal action. In 2019, Prince Andrew told the BBC that he had not had sex with "It didn't happen," he said. He also said that he had no recollection of having met her. EFTA00039970

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020

SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 SDNY News Clips Thursday, January 30, 2020 Contents Public Corruption 2 Avenatti 2 Epstein 4 Pamas 8 Terrorism and International Narcotics 9 Virgil Griffith 9 White Plains 10 Grogg 10 Matters of Interest 11 Weinstein 11 Bolton 14 1 EFTA00095967 SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 Public Corruption Avenatti Avenatti didn't care about ruining teens' lives in Nike case, lawyer says NY Post By Ruth Weissmann 1/30/2020 Lightning-rod lawyer Michael Avenatti was allegedly so hellbent on extorting an eight-figure sum from Nike that he didn't care who got hurt — including teenage basketball players, a witness testified Thursday. In his second day of testimony in Manhattan federal court, Nike attorney Scott Wilson recounted the "Twilight Zone" meetings in which Avenatti allegedly tried to extort the company for $20 million under threat of exposing purported corruption in youth basketball linked to the athl

15p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014263

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi

32p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014243

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.