Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01266327DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01266327

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01266327
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 2001 TRUST ONE I am the Grantor of THE JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 2001 TRUST ONE ("the trust"). Pursuant to Article FIFTEENTH of the trust, I have the power to amend the trust. I amended the trust on June 27, 2003, December 3, 2004 and February 6, 2006. I hereby make this FOURTH AMENDMENT to the trust as follows: FIRST I hereby remove GHISLAINE MAXWELL and IRA ZICHERMAN as successor co-Trustees of the trust and designate DARREN K. INDYKE, JOSEPH PAGANO and LAWRENCE NEWMAN as successor co-Trustees in their place. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this FOURTH AMENDMENT on the s "( day of .4, , 2007. 507642.1 CONFIDENTIAL GJ 000227 SDNY_GM_00007904 EFTA_00 120576 EFTA01266327 41 rif re- er frew (ik,e,„- y et . 4/6- &a- j's At 4-* Ys Ric ) ) ss.: ) On the ...s- it day of rep 4,-1, in the year 2007, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed th ent. 507642.1 UREN J. KWINTNER Notary Public, State of New York No. 02KW6016686 Qualified in New York County Commission Expires November 30. 20 CONFIDENTIAL GJ 000228 SDNY_GM:00007905 EFTA_00I 20577 EFTA01266328

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.