EFTA01266354

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 10

Reference

efta-01266354

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO RESTATED TRUST THE JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 2001 TRUST TWO I am the Grantor of THE JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 2001 TRUST TWO ("the trust"). Pursuant to Article TWELFTH of the trust, I have the power to amend the trust. The trust was amended and restated on March 8, 2002 and was further amended on January 13, 2004, December 3, 2004, and ig,A,,a„..r, act 7 I hereby make this FOURTH AMENDMENT to the Restated Trust as follows: FIRST I hereby remove HENRY JARECKI as successor co-Trustee of the trust and designate DARREN K. INDYKE, JOSEPH PAGANO and LAWRENCE NEWMAN as successor co-Trustees in his place. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this FOURTH AMENDMENT on the s day of .fr k,,.4-1,- , 200'7. 358398.1 Jeffrey E. Epsiein, Grantor CONFIDENTIAL GJ 000291 SDNY_GM_00007968 EFTA_00120640 EFTA01266354 s rei re 4O.- ye AA" ) ) SS.: 4.0 cir,tyry of .Ur-w y ) On the 74 day of re> • k.n. C« in the year 2007, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed th • ent. 358398.1 UREN J. KWINTNER Nota Pu li State of New York No. Qualified in New YorkCounty Commission Expires November 30, 20 L.t".. CONFIDENTIAL GJ 000292 SDNY_GM:0000796.9 EFTA_00120641 EFTA01266355

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.