Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01297513DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01297513

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01297513
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Deutsche Bank Weaith Management German Banking Separation Act Account Opening Questionnaire Family Office Annex Name of Client (Required) The 2017 Caterpillar Trust I attest that: A) The prospective account holder is a Family office, as defined below and the relationship among the Family Members has been described to me by the principals as set forth in the attachment hereto: B) No person has guaranteed the repayment of any potential liabilities (including overdrafts) of the prospective account holder that may result from the account relationship; C) I am not aware that any alternative investment fund CALF) could have recourse to the assets of the account holder; and O) 'I attest that I have provided all relevant information and documentation made available by the client/prospect to me to assist in the GBSA review under this Questionnaire." Darren Indyke as contact for The 2017 Caterpillar Trust Signature of Name of Client Representative_ Date O1c1 have completed this Questionnaire and attest that it is accurate to the best of my knowledge based upon the information and documentation provided to me by the banking team.' Signature of Individual completing form from the Center of ExcellencerGBSA Questionnaire Preparation Team Nowt, iirw Rowena Thomas Ceti-2044M ti11.04.10 Name of Individual completing form from the Center of ExcelienceJGBSA Questionnaire Preparation Team Rowena Thomas Date Family Office exemption. "Family office" means an undertaking that has been established by a pre-existing group of family members exclusively for the investment of their private wealth. 'Pre-existing group means a group of family members, irrespective of the legal structure that may be put in place by them. to invest in an undertaking and provided that the sole ultimate beneficiaries of such structure are family members, where the existence of the group pre-dates the establishment of the undertaking. The definition of `pre-existing group' does not prevent family members from joining the group after the undertaking has been established. 'Family members" means the spouse of an individual. the person who is living with an individual in a committed intimate relationship, in a joint household and on a stable and continuous basis, the relatives In direct line. the siblings. uncles. aunts. first cousins and the dependents of an individual insti7eirie assass.(00417 Page 1 of 2 SDNY_GM_00060818 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.QP AKE I DENTIAL DB-SDNY-0023643 EFTA_00171332 EFTA01297513 Description of the relationship among the Family Members -The entity is a trust for the purpose of retaining the grantors annuity trust. The trust grantor is Jeffrey Epstein the beneficiary is the grantor and the 2013 Butterfly Trust, the trustees are Lesley Goff and Daphne Wallace. O 2017 DautaChe Bank AG. Ail ngnat rfilarvaa Waa179140 026256.103117 SDNY_Glit_00060819 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED R.QP .NEIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0023644 EFTA 00171333 EFTA01297514

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.