Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01307705DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01307705

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01307705
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
FD-1057 (Rev. 5-8-10) (Overall Document Classification Required) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Electronic Communication Title: (U//FOUO) TO REQUEST TRAVEL REFERENCE Date: 12/04/2018 CAPTIONED CASE. Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 31E-MM-NEW (U) EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Details: Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 11/13/2006 To: New York Attn: SSA Squad 20 Newark SSA RBRA-2 From: Miami PB2 PB RA ontact: SA Approved By: Drafted By: ID f: 31E-MM- 108062 (Pending) Title: JEFFREY EPSTEIN; IMO; GHISLAINE N. MAXWELL WSTA - CHILD PROSTITUTION Synopsis: To request travel reference captioned case. Administrative: Reference telcall between SA and SSA and SSA on 12/07/2006. Details: On 07/24/2006 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Palm Beach County Resident Agency (PBCRA), opened an investigation involving multi -millionaire Jeffrey Epstein and captioned subjects. The investigation involves numerous underage females, who attended local high schools, who were recruited for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity with Epstein. At the conclusion of the sexual activity, the minors were paid sums of money ranging from $200.00 - $1,000.00. FBI Miami, PBCRA, request travel concurrence with FBI New York and Newark for the purpose of interviewing pertinent witnesses. SA's and AUSA will travel on 12/14/2006 and anticipate interviewing witnesses from 12/14 /2006 - 12/17/2006. It is anticipated that SA's and AUSA will return to West Palm, FL on 12/17/2006. LEAD (s) : Set Lead 1: (Info) NEW YORK AT NEW YORK, NEW YORK FBI Miami request travel concurrence from FBI New York to conduct witness interviews. Set Lead 2: (Info) NEWARK AT REDBANK, NEW JERSEY FBI Miami request travel concurrence from FBI Newark to conduct witness interviews. • • (Overall Document Classification Required) CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00328079 EFTA 00200831 EFTA01307705

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.