Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01360660DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01360660

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01360660
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic12921.gif) Janice Franklin, CAMS, CFSA, CFIRS Vice President I AML Compliance Officer Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas Compliance 60 wall Street, 1000S-2836 New York, NY, USA Tel. Fax Emai (Embedded image moved to file: pic17156.gif) From: Amanda Kirby To: Janice Franklin Date: 03/03/2014 02:19 PM Subject: Re: J. Epstein KYC updates: Additional signer [I] Classification: For internal use only I understand the broadness of the letter but I don't see how darren could be added as jeffrey is not authorized on her accounts. It would be impossible to add him to that account without her signature. Is that not sufficient for the kyc purposes? Original Message From: Janice Franklin Sent: 03/03/2014 02:05 PM EST To: Amanda Kirby cc: Jacqueline Lightbody subject: Re: J. Epstein KYC updates: Additional signer [I] Classification: For internal use only That was my guess. The point I wanted to make is given how the letter is written Mr. Indyke should be added to account. why? Because the letter states ". . . to give Mr. Indyke signing authority . . . on all accounts associated with the Southern Financial Relationship. account is associated with the Southern Financial Relationship. I recommend that Mr. Epstein sends you another letter listing the specific accounts he wants to update or he could broadly write he would like Mr. Indyke added to the accounts in his (Mr. Epstein's) name and where he is the ultimate beneficial owner. If the instructions are written in this manner, account would not be an issue. Regards, Janice P. Franklin (Embedded image moved to file: pic22333.gif) Janice Franklin, CAMS, CFSA, CFIRS Vice President I AML Compliance Officer CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0049131 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00195315 EFTA01360660

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.