Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01360662DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01360662

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01360662
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Date: 03/03/2014 12:30 PM Subject: Re: J. Epstein KYC Updates: Additional signer [I] Classification: For internal use only Hi Janice, Luckily I was visiting friends and have been with them at their house instead of at the airport! i spoke with Jeffrey and he said he wanted Darren added to all of his accounts including his personal and Southern Trust. They do most wires out of his personal account and he wants Darren to be able to sign for them. I also am still under the impression that his personal and ST accounts are under the southern Financial Relationship as that is how I see them on DBForce. Does this help? Original Message From: Janice Franklin Sent: 03/03/2014 12:15 PM EST To: Amanda Kirby Cc: Jacqueline Lightbody Subject: Re: J. Epstein KYC Updates: Additional signer [I] Classification: For internal use only Hi Amanda: So sorry to hear you are stuck. Hopefully, you're not stuck in the airport but in your hotel room. Let's see if we can address my questions via email. Did you assist Mr. Epstein with the drafting of his letter which states that Mr. Indyke should be added as an additional signer "on all accounts associated with [the "Southern Financial Relationship"]? If I take the letter literally, Mr. indyke should not be added to all of Mr. Epstein's accounts. How do you know it was Mr. Epstein's intent to add Mr. indyke to all his accounts given that all accounts are not under the "southern Financial Relationship"? Thanks. Regards, Janice P. Franklin (Embedded image moved to file: pic18301.gif) Janice Franklin, CAMS, CFSA, CFIRS Vice President I AML Compliance officer Deutsche sank Trust Company Americas Compliance 60 wall Street 10005-2836 New York, NY, USA Tel. Fax Emai (Embedded image moved to file: pic24472.gif) From: Amanda Kirby CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0049133 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00195317 EFTA01360662

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.