Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01362610DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01362610

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01362610
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Cc: Clifford Fourie Yes, we are currently working with our KCP teams to pull together the list of WM clients where we are dependent on ICG to place orders. This list as agreed with you will be taken within CIB management to get approval for ICG to take orders even if the GM status is red in tradefinder. We will get back to you with the list as soon as we have the reviewed data. Best, Tanu Tanu Kirti Director WM Mercury Implementation Programme Manager Tel. + - Mobile Ema "WM Mercury en myCe" From: lain Macara Sent: 19 July 2018 11:13 >; Aamir Akram < >; Max Kleinert >; Oliver Bettin Tanushree Kirti Christopher Whyton < Subject: RE: Family Office Initiative - Follow Up [I] Hi Katherine — thanks for including me. There's been a lot a dialogue with Wealth on the ACO subject this last week or 2 with Tanushree on point for Wealth (cc'ed). The approach we agreed with regard to WM clients needing GM product coverage is summarised below: Wealth will define a client perimeter with the central Mercury programme and assign ACOs to all those clients (including KCP) If ICG has it's own relationship with the client as well, then ICG will also have an ACO and the client would be green in the ICG perimeter If ICG does not have it's own relationship with the client, then the client would remain red in ICG - (importantly this does not mean the GM infrastructure will be closed as of course the GM business relationship remains green at the DB level by virtue of having an eligible ACO allocated) Where ICG input is required on client that are red in ICG, we are looking to Stefan/Louise approve that: i. ICG people are allowed to take orders from Wealth people; and ii. we will continue to have no ACO for the client and therefore Wealth will own the KYC entirely Believe Tanushree and team are working on the list? (To facilitate Katherine, we'd look to deploy a new flag in TF etc telling our guys they won't get dinged on these clients) Shout with qs CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0052104 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00198288 EFTA01362610

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.