Case File
efta-01362655DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01362655
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01362655
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Tanu Kirti
Director
WM Mercury Implementation Programme Manager
Tel.
Mobi
Em
From: lain Macara
Sent: 19 July 2018 11:13
To: Katherine Stead
; Aamir Akram
Max Kleinert
Cc: Clifford Fouri
Oliver Bett
; Christopher Whyto
Subject: RE: Family Office Initiative - Follow Up DJ
Hi Katherine — thanks for including me.
Tanushree Kirti
There's been a lot a dialogue with Wealth on the ACO subject this last week or 2 with Tanushree on point for Wealth
(cc'ed).
The approach we agreed with regard to WM clients needing GM product coverage is summarised below:
•
Wealth will define a client perimeter with the central Mercury programme and assign ACOs to all those clients
(including KCP)
•
If ICG has it's own relationship with the client as well, then ICG will also have an ACO and the client would be
green in the ICG perimeter
•
If ICG does not have it's own relationship with the client, then the client would remain red in ICG - (importantly
this does not mean the GM infrastructure will be closed as of course the GM business relationship remains green at the
DB level by virtue of having an eligible ACO allocated)
•
Where ICG input is required on client that are red in ICG, we are looking to Stefan/Louise approve that:
i.
ICG people are allowed to take orders from Wealth people; and
ii.
we will continue to have no ACO for the client and therefore Wealth will own the KYC entirely
•
Believe Tanushree and team are working on the list?
•
(To facilitate Katherine, we'd look to deploy a new flag in TF etc telling our guys they won't get dinged on these
clients)
Shout with qs
thanks
From: Katherine Stead
Sent: 19 July 2018 10:37
To: Aamir Akram
Max Kleinert <
Cc: Clifford Fourie
; Oliver Bettin
Subject: Family Office Initiative - Follow Up [I]
ain Macara
Classification: For Internal use only
Further to our call this morning, the following thoughts come to mind where we have a FO's being covered exclusively by
KCP employees who are accessing GM systems:
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
DB-SDNY-0052159
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00198343
EFTA01362655
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.