Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01363299DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01363299

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01363299
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 9 91 F.3d 385, *; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19807, **; 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 Finally, the district court's order is not immediately appealable [HN5] under the "collateral order" exception to the final judgment rule set forth in Cohen (**11] v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47, 93 L. Ed. 1528, 69 S. Ct. 1221 (1949). Under Cohen, an interlocutory order is immediately appealable if, inter alia, the order would "be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment." Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468, 57 L. Ed. 2d 351, 98 S. Ct. 2454 (1978). In the present case, we would not be foreclosed from reviewing the district court's denial of the Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint on an appeal from a final judgment. See Richardson p389] Greenshields Sec., Inc. v. Lau, 825 F.2d 647, 651 (2d Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the collateral order exception does not apply to this case. See DeNubilo, 343 F.2d at 456-57 (holding that the collateral order exception does not apply to an order denying a motion to amend a complaint). CONCLUSION In view of the foregoing, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. NATIONAL INDEPENDENT THEATRE EXHIBITORS, INC., Plaintiff, James T. Patterson, Sr., individually and d/b/a/ Screen Advertising Film Fund, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUENA VISTA DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees No. 83-8638 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 748 F.2d 602; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15990; 1984-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66,311; 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 954 December 12, 1984 PRIOR HISTORY: rii Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Screen Advertising Film Fund Corp. v. Buena Vista Distribution Co., 100 F.R.D. 14, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14570 (N.D. Ga., 1983) CASE SUMMARY: PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiffs, a corporation and its president, appealed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant distributors in plaintiffs' suit alleging For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0053249 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00199433 EFTA01363299

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.