EFTA01368197

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this response in opposition to Epstein's Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). Epstein's motion is a thinly-disguised attempt to relitigate issues already covered by the court's earlier ruling eleven months ago (DE 188), which allowed the victims to file correspondence relating to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement in the public court file. Rather than reverse its previous ruling, this Court should reaffirm it — and allow the important issues presented by this case to be litigated in the light of day. BACKGROUND Because of Epstein's penchant for relitigating issues that have already been decided, it

EFTA Document EFTA01695623

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

-- I have received and reviewed your letter. I cannot print and sign until I am back in the office on 11/15.

Dear -- I have received and reviewed your letter. I cannot print and sign until I am back in the office on 11/15. From: To: Cc: Subject: L.n.scb E. ktc Jcincy J-pw.ctiti - Lsni6atiun nuustivital Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:20:52 +0000 Importance: Normal Thanks much Enjoy your cruise and thank you very much for the information. I.(USAFLS) Thursday. November I4Rrt> arp the FRI aceRntc invnlvprl in the original investigation: Original supervisor was (I think he is now in DC). Later replaced by The ASAC and SAC also attended meetings to discuss the plea negotiations. From our Office, most of the key players are gone, but their electronic files will have to be preserved: R. Alexander Acosta At DOJ, there is/was At Palm Beach PD, was the Chief, he is no longer there. as the Detective. I think he is still there. Those were the only two we ever dealt with. The lawyers for Epstein were: Kenneth Starr Jay Lefkowitz Alan Dershowitz Lily Roy Black Jack Goldber

EFTA Document EFTA01689427