Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01381993DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01381993

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01381993
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
C) O 0 Z Z 11 -II Page 16 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2009 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Palm Beach Marine Construction, Inc v. Epstein op PLAINTIFF: Palm Beach Marine Construction, Inc CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:09cv80175 FILING DATE: 2/11/2009 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Senior Judge Ryskamp, Kenneth L NATURE OF SUIT: 220 Foreclosure FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: Diversity28 USC 1332 JURY DEMAND: None DEMAND: $ 105,000 STATUS: Case Closed PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY(S): Lian. Alexander Oscar [COR LD NTC] 777 Brickell Avenue Suite 1210 Miami, FL, USA 33131 305.381.7910 Fax: 305.381.7135 Email: ALIAN[#064]ALEXANDERLIAN.COM o) DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): zt:i 0 William Chester Brewer, Jr [COR LD NTC] io —< ci°0, 250 Australian Avenue South c z 0 i _c A1112 Research Prolik 0 i 0 0 1.3 0 modified 6'132007 IV CO —a —1 For infernal we only Co IV OD —• to —1 Last EFTA01381993

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.