Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01386393DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01386393

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01386393
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Kale Johnson v Donald 3 'I'rumparal Jeffrey E Frown Trump Child Rape Chum Tor 5)00 Minton Merged by Trump Arroniey I Gkbat Research • Centre for Research on Globehyshon ADOU: (:::("Z3C1 tier- treinip Stcit Arc,- •• I.'s:. Ca GlobalResearch goo to, Otutothrehoo filobeireSisarcisca / globakeseareleerg Search Authors... Search... GR Newsletter, Enter Email GO Note see en Fringes !Tonkel:baton (a ;blare, Deosch Portugues sires kesl, (eobalizacien I Asia .9'yeire Research 00 US Nato War Economy Civil Rights Environment Poverty Media Justice 9/11 War Crimes Militarization History Science Latest News Et Top Stories Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein: Trump Child Rape Claim for $100 Million Denied by Trump Attorney By wham Poredman Al'. Ghee*. Now a (ex:2 d Etat in Italy' Global Research July 07.2016 Sea Massacre Update 'Decent Hutment." Reader Swooned News 6 arty 2016 Ws BOyCOt Apartheid ;net and AN Its Regan USA Supporters Theme Law and Justice Ireceptn Report, Ll S Erection Local Auloncmy. A Key to Protection of the Ecosystem ne, Philo:Ines Apo isfarttl a Ii Star 0 an 3 tt-ctcr.--c-ic; Tra-_:- Australia's China Sy: Pottle Sinister Maeattir VMS Centime Maiersa s Muayx4ar Cosso Malaysia Debts and the Push ice Revers Trurne'S Trade War wen Chem imagine %Mot Would Happen if China Decreed to Buy Voxxts horn Stria el7mn Here S Global Research Publishers Click Here To Order Online !The allegabors are net only calegonmay false, bun disgusting at Me levee level and clearly framed to soles media attention or. rmre )they, are Wince*/ motivated To be clear there * abeedely no merit tomes& clams and based on au investgation, no evidence trat tee person who has made these alligators actually crests' - Alan Garton. corporate atrorney for Dewed Trump. April 28. 2016 The federal e3W1U11 teed Kat* Johnsen v I3onaid J. Trump and Jeffrey E Epsten, accuses Trump and Epstein of rape and Other mouse assaults Cuing the summa of 1994. when plaintiff was 13 years old Morney Garton domed the accusations and east *eerie on the exeaterne of the pia will Attorney Gartens denial of rape claims against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein dates from April 2016 when the case was filed by a ifteete Jenne:me a PoeninVe NehTlsoryTh, On Aire 28 in LJ. S Distret Caitlin Riverdale, CeiliCeele (none of peentee The case APPSTIWth, Ned pro se by the pantie acting wee:ea a lawyer. sought $103 rmOran m damages from defendants for, among Other tangs, vottang her Civil Rights at-417i making her flea sex slave' Tim case appears to nave been brat reported ortre by Elei1/414eii cent, when ircluded Centres clemal as iota as a sarreeng of the lund details of the allegations Other early coverage appears to have been lirreed to other online news sees eltl.Xleg RADAR nitre, Wining 7.-etriocrats, Sunday Exoress kliAleda erg. and HYDetyeleies corn Less than a week after the case was filed larder federal Civil Rights statutes. a federal Judge ruled that rt was a mistake and drumsun the Lase. On May 2. citing the CM, Rieke tees of the sue. the judge wrote 'Even construing the pleading liberally, Fleeter has not alleged terry race-based or class-based animus against her, and conseguertly. her allegations fait to state a dam upon *tech reset may ce granted • The derhaVal receved oven less coverage than the Ring RADAR online reported "Judge Trashes Bogus D>riald Trump Rape Lawsuit,' even though the Judge had rued on 7,e on the terms of the fi leg, rot on any of the substance of tee case as 'bogus' or otherwise Once diSeitSSed however, Ire case was over, at *ast for the moment Flaired Could have re.feed the OOrTpiThOt zr1CO:TeCt form m Caefornia. Instead she apparently found a lawyer to for for her in New Yak. the horns state el both defendants On June 20, seven weeks after tee California darnssal. New -*mei attorney Thanes Francis Ws ghef bled tie Sarre case in rev sed tam al US Deed Court for the S)uteen Dist:lie of NeW ?orlon terra of teameiff 'Jere Doe proceedng urger a irtietidonyni and seeking a jury trial The filing is lined 'Compiaint for tape, sexual inicicoduct, aininal sexual acts. sexual abuse. forcible touching assault battery intentional and ie rle% tnittnan of emotional distress. duress. false imprsonment and defamation' The complarti aurora's central issues in the case suecincey: 'Plainer' was subeact to acts of rape, sexual mtscooduet crenate Sexual aces, sexual abuse. forobe touching °MU !, battery. Wentiene I and reclouss inaction of emonanal *stress. duress, false imprisonment, and threats of deals emitter serous bodily injury by the Defendants that tooX place at several penes during the sunvner Meths of 1994 The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York Oty residence that was teng used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E 71st St. Vanneran (levien as the Weser Mansion) During this period. Plainer! was a Moce of age 13 ' According to tne oorreitaire Plaimth Jane Doe came to New Yolk II re spring of 1994 in MOPe of starting a modeling career. Professorate/ unprepared. she nod little successes and was headed home when she met Tiffany Doe. another pseudonym. who worked for Epsten from 1990 to 20:10 re-outing young women to Mimi hs parties and entertan his guests Tirlany Doe. age 26 in 1934, promised Jane Doe that she would be paid to attend these partes at which she wooer meet people *no could help her start her ell.X5eing career. Jane Doe attended at least four of Eretent parties at when she weeracted with bon, Trump and Epstein sexually. as Gess-reed graphoacy m the complaint and n attached affidavits tithe tee women. Tiffany Doe. in her affidavit says she was a witness to the Ceres described by Jane Doe To compensate for tee treatment Jane Doe seeks unspeafied 'special damages compensatory damages, end puree* cbmages (preen:rely requested 5100 million) The complaint makes several other requests of the court that have not yet been acted on To proceed anonymously - where Jane Doe's ereacy outweighs any peak interest and does not prejudice oefeixterrs To wane any statute of rentations - or. the bass that Defendants threats to harm plaintiff ameer her family ;he/Amity deprived plaintiff of the freedom to fee her complaint earlier To issue a Protective order - to prolate plaintiff 'from harm and harassment from Defendants and their agent* and associates To fire; that Defendants nave defamed Jars Doe - in particular in at-piney Garten's April 28 statement (quoted above) because i '* libelous on es face, and clearly exposes Plaintiff to lotted. contempt. mks* and or:fogey ' Defendants rave not yet feed a response to the June 20 peen et Deist Nor has Mere apparenter been art pJbec response from Attorney Nips no gIobalresnechcalcatrelohroon-v-JonakTiTnyrnp-end-lelhey-c-cpsten-tromp-child-rape-chim•lor-I00-milhon-dohelby•Trummettorney)5511676(6/V20I8 6 35 17 Pelt CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0088070 SDNY_GM_00234254 EFTA01386393

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297066

0p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Exhibit B

Exhibit B EFTA00095558 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation November 2020 EFTA00095559 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Justice (Department) Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigated allegations that in 2007-2008, prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO) improperly resolved a federal investigation into the criminal conduct of Jeffrey Epstein by negotiating and executing a federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA). The NPA was intended to end a federal investigation into allegations that Epstein engaged in illegal sexual activity with girls.' OPR also investigated whether USAO prosecutors committed professional misconduct by failing to cons

14p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.