Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01387779DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01387779

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01387779
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 7 A minor royal wedding - but no showboating romance; Princess Eugenie, youngest daughter of Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew, has coped with her share of scandal and strife. Her wedding to long-term boyfriend Jack will bring her a 'pillar of support,' writes Julia Molony Sunday Independent August 26, 2018 But if their marriage was already rocky, abundant rumours of Fergie's infidelity finally torpedoed it. In 1993, the couple announced their separation, in the face of growing scandal, which prompted the Queen to take the unprecedented step of making her displeasure about the whole furore known. "In view of the media speculation which the Queen finds especially undesirable during the general election campaign, Her Majesty is issuing the following statement," her press office said. "Last week, lawyers acting for the Duchess of York initiated discussions about a formal separation for the Duke and Duchess. These discussions are not yet completed and nothing will be said until they are. The Queen hopes that the media will spare the Duke and Duchess of York and their children any intrusion." Such hopes, however, were quickly dashed. Soon after the announcement The Sun newspaper published photos of Fergie, who was still officially married to Prince Andrew, reclining on a sun lounger in the South of France, having her feet kissed and fondled by Texan financial adviser John Bryan. The ensuing disgrace saw Fergie effectively banished from The Firm. Princess Margaret, it is alleged, wrote to her to say, "You have done more to bring shame on the royal family than could ever have been imagined. Not once have you hung your head in embarrassment, even for a minute. Clearly you have never considered the damage you are doing us all. How dare you discredit us?' And rumour has it that Prince Philip's antipathy for her is so great that to this day, he refuses to be in the same room as her. For her own part, Fergie has always put a more positive spin on things. According to her, her priority has always been to maintain friendly relations with the in-laws. "When I met with Her Majesty about (the divorce), she asked, 'What do you require, Sarah?' and I said, 'Your friendship' - which I think amazed her because everyone said I would demand a big settlement. But I wanted to be able to say, 'Her Majesty is my friend' - not fight her, nor have lawyers saying, 'Look, she is greedy'. I left my marriage knowing I'd have to work. I have." And so, following her divorce, Sarah gamely did her best to leverage her profile into a career (she was a long-standing ambassador for Weight Watchers, and she penned children's books). She also was at pains to maintain a warm relationship with her ex- husband. "A table can't stand on three legs, really," she told Hello. "So you have the Duke and I, and the two girls. We're a family unit and we lead by example... We support each other emotionally and we support each other health wise. At least every two weeks we sit down and communicate, the four of us." At a certain point, however, she made the ill-fated decision to use her good favour with Andrew for her own gain. In 2010 she was caught in a tabloid sting, when she offered a journalist posing as a foreign businessman access to her influential husband for a fee of £500,000. For internal use only For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0090935 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00237119 EFTA01387779

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01401218

0p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Allegations linking Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and a Virgin Islands governor’s wife to alleged sexual misconduct and a million‑dollar politica...

The passage repeats known public allegations about Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein, but adds a specific claim of a $1 million donation to a Virgin Islands governor’s reelection campaign and mentions Roberts’ lawsuit alleges Prince Andrew was forced into sexual activity with her on Little St. James The manager of two Virgin Islands‑based corporations owned by Epstein is reported to be the wife o

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightUnknown

Document references alleged sexual misconduct claims involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell’s post‑Epstein activities, and Prince Andrew

Document references alleged sexual misconduct claims involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell’s post‑Epstein activities, and Prince Andrew The passage strings together several well‑known allegations (Dershowitz, Maxwell, Prince Andrew) but provides no new specifics, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It repeats publicly reported claims and lacks concrete evidence or novel connections, limiting investigative value. Key insights: Mentions a refuted review of sexual misconduct accusations against Alan Dershowitz.; Notes Ghislaine Maxwell’s nonprofit TerraMar Project and prior funding of Seed Media Group by Epstein ($2 M in 2005).; References Maxwell’s attendance at Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding and a 2014 Iditarod participation claim.

1p
House OversightMar 11, 2011

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal The passage is a promotional, anecdotal recount of Oscar season events and film festival screenings. It mentions industry figures (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, etc.) but provides no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads linking them to misconduct or illicit activity. The content is largely descriptive and lacks novel, verifiable claims that would merit investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Peggy Siegal describes her role as a publicist covering Oscar campaigns.; Mentions various high‑profile filmmakers and actors (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, Tom Hooper, Colin Firth).; Describes festival strategies and award‑season lobbying tactics.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01867763

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.