Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01392275DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01392275

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01392275
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
GLDUS128 Patrick Gerschel iCapital Advisors, LLC Form ADV Part 2A Funds. The Gen II relationship will be managed by several iCapital executives. BNY Capital Corporation ("BNY") BNY holds a minority ownership interest in Institutional Capital Network, Inc., the parent company of iCapital. Certain of the Funds hold cash in accounts at BNY and utilize BNY administrative services. This relationship may create an incentive to select BNY to provide services in respect of the Funds. iCapital Investors A number of asset managers have invested in Institutional Capital Network, Inc.. the parent company of iCapital, including affiliates of BlackRock, Inc. ("BlackRock") and Credit Suisse Group AG ("Credit Suisse"). iCapital may offer products managed or sponsored by such investors as BlackRock and Credit Suisse or its affiliates and these relationships may create an incentive to select BlackRock or Credit Suisse products as the underlying fund in an iCapital Private Access Fund. In addition. select financial services companies. including affiliates of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney ("Morgan Stanley") and UBS Financial Services ("UBS") have made equity investments in Institutional Capital Network. Inc. iCapital may offer Private Access Funds to clients of Morgan Stanley and UBS and such investment in iCapital's parent may create an additional incentive for Morgan Stanley and UBS to direct its investments to an iCapital Private Access Fund. Finally, iCapital has and may continue to engage with certain of its equity investors to provide services to the Funds. including administration or other services. iCapital will manage these conflicts by identifying them in the applicable Fund offering documents and if applicable, by maintaining its independent diligence process and procedures, regardless of the identity of the underlying manager, and by negotiating on an arms-length basis the terms of any service providers to the Funds, including any equity investors in iCapital. Item I I: Code of Ethics, Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Personal Trading Code of Ethics Pursuant to Rule 204A-I of the Advisers Act Pursuant to Rule 204A- I of the Advisers Act, iCapital has adopted a Code of Ethics that establishes various procedures with respect to investment transactions in accounts in which employees of iCapital or related persons have a beneficial interest or accounts over which an employee has investment discretion. iCapital's Code of Ethics was adopted to avoid possible conflicts of interest and ensure the propriety of our employees' and principals' trading activity. iCapital's Code of Ethics prohibits insider trading and provides instructions to employees when coming into possession of material nonpublic information. The foundation of the Code of Ethics is based on the underlying principles that: - Employees must at all times place the interests of the client first: - Employees must make sure that all personal securities transactions are conducted 23 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0097467 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00243651 EFTA01392275

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016484

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02420041

58p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

USDC SDNY

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/15/21 SMITH VILLAZOR November 15, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell, No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: Smith Villazor LLF. New York, New York 10019 www.smithvillazor.com Patrick J. Smith may file a motion to quash the subpoena on or before Friday, November 19, 2021. The motion should not repeat arguments made in the Government's motion to quash, which is due on Thursday, November 18, 2021. The Defense shall respond to both motions on or before Monday, November 22, 2021. This memo endorsement is filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties to propose redactions. Any redactions to this letter and the Defendant's motion must be filed on the docket by November 21, 2021. SO ORDERED. We represen the independent admircstrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Pr

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01414705

3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01434396

6p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.