Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01406199DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01406199

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01406199
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Subject: RE: Clarification Re uired on CDD Form - Section C From: Morgan Trichel Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:42:31 -040U To: Vijay-A Sawant Cc: Stewart Oldfie Bradley Gillin Dear Vijay, From what I have observed and heard from compliance it seems as long as we can tie the address from the individual to the entity it should suffice. See attached email from KG from compliance, although not the same situation similar to the approach. Hope his helps. Kind Regards, Morgan Trichel AML Business Risk Analyst Deutsche Bank Trust Company, National Association Deutsche Bank Wealth Management 5022 Gate Parkway #400 Jacksonville, FL 32256 USA Tel Email: From: Vijay-A Sawant Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 6:21 AM To: Morgan Trichel Cc: Stewart Oldfiel Subject: Clarification P‘4qu_:rc,A Importance: High Good Morning Morgan, 3.J >; Bradley Gillin m - Section C I have a query regarding attached CDD forms that I have received from the bankers recently. Note all the accounts included are from the same relationship. Under Section c, the legal address for the UBO - Jeffrey Epstein is same as the entity address. Plea se advise if this is acceptable? Or should the address be same as his personal address indicated in his driver's license, also attached for reference. Kindly advise, so I can ask for changes to ALL of the CDD forms accordingly, thanks. Kind Regards, Vijay Sawant KYC Case Representative EFTA01406199 Deutsche CIB Centre Private Limited - Deutsche Bank Group Wealth Management Bl, DB Centre Mumbai, Nirlon Knowledge Park, Western Express Highway Gore•aon East, Mumbai - 400063 , India EFTA01406200

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.