Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01458542DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01458542

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01458542
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Jul Se!lynNIS 4ung OipSine() Strategy Flashcard Strategy Flashcard S&P 500 to reach 2300 by 2016 end on a long expansionary cycle of moderate growth 2015 end target: 2050 2016 end target: 2300 Div Yld: 2% 2014A 2015E 2016E Quarterly EPS EPS $118 $119.50 $128 1Q14A $28.00 1Q15A $28.65 PE on yearend S&P targets 17.4 17.2 18.0 2Q14A $29.75 2Q15E $30.20 DPS $39 $42 $45 3Q14A $30.00 3Q1SE `$29.75 EPS/DPS growth 696/8% 1%/8% 796/7% 4Q14A $30.25 4Q15E $31.00 Market strategy and tactics: Lower S&P returns than history likely, but still decent and few alternatives - stay involved, buy on dips Consider lesson of 2014: Interest rates stayed very low despite better growth and tighter labor market Next 5%+ move is likely: Up Risk of near-term correction: Moderate "S&P PE stands on the shoulders of bonds." Thematic and sector strategy: Tilt toward: 1) Secular Growth Sectors - industries with strong sales growth in the middle of economic cycles 2) Sales Growth near 5% - industries not dependent on margin expansion to drive 5%+ EPS growth 3) High ROE or long competitive advantage - ability to defend ROE/margins amidst low interest rates 4) Dividend Growth - stocks with ability to significantly raise dividend payout ratios 5) Debt Capacity -companies that can issue cheap debt for acquisitions and share buybacks Tilt away from: 1) Consumer companies w/tired brands or facing tough competition (seek unique products/experiences) 2) Smaller cap cyclical plays which are still expensive, prefer big-cap banks and select retailers 3) Commodity and industrial capital goods producers, prefer Transports Reasons to still buy stocks: 1) —2.5% US GDP likely in 2015 2) S&P EPS will rise despite $/oil 3) PEs justifiable and been higher 4) Bond yields are nil after inflation Dare to ask: Why not 2500+ S&P cycle-high? 2500+ = - 18x 2018E EPS of - $145 S&P 500 avg. trailing 4qtr PE: 1960.2014 16.0 1985.2014 17.6 1995-2014 18.6 2005-2014 15.9 Sectors/Industries: Health Care, Tech Health Care, Tech, Consumer Disc. Tech, Health Care, some Consumer Big Banks, Mega-cap Tech Tech, Health Care, some Consumer Staples Be selective and valuation mindful Energy, Industrial Capital Goods Risks - US tax on foreign profits, whether repatriated or not, threatens large multinationals and would cause margin contraction - EM economy weakness that causes a steep decline in commodity prices, especially oil, and threatens US exports and investment spending - A surge in long-term interest rates or any global economic shock would threaten our constructive view on the S&P for 2015 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0 118505 SDNY_GM_00264689 EFTA01458542

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.