Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01480730DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01480730

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01480730
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
First Name DARREN Full Name DARREN INDYKE Middle Name Gender Male Last Name INDY KE Date of Birth Suffix Primary Country of Assets UNITED STATES PreviousName/PAMN/Alias Citizenship UNITED STATES Employer Name Darren K Indvko PDX High Risk Jurisdiction No Occupation Lawyer Industry Code (NAIL) indiVidURES 19999401 Years at Occupation 6 Secondary Industry Code (NAIC) NAIC NOT PROVIDED 1 I Addreastes) Type Notes Address City, State, Postal Code Country Tools Entered by Date of Update Preferred Legs: LIVINGSTON New Jerw, UNITED STATES Map it BATCH 10:07.2009 Yes 07039 Phone(s► /Fax(s) TYPs Notes Phone Number Tools Entered by Date of U•date Preferred Other Verily 'Do Not Call' List SYSTEM 02/12/2013 Yes Cost Center & Hierarchy Client Status Client Client Type Individual Client Sponsor WILLIAM M SHERIDAN New or Existing Client Existing Cost Center 143360 - USPB UHNW NYC TRI STATE EXEC Client service Team CHBG (DE) 4 Entity Type Entity GIO Paul S Barrett Portfolio Manager Trust Advisor Investor Decision Maker JEFFREY E EPSTEIN DIA ECI Identification Withholding Federal Status Domestic Certified Withholding SSNrrIN Certification Date 10:04,2013 SSNiTINEIN Form of government issued Identification obtained for the files Passport Primary Identification Number Issued By UNITED STATES Date Issued 03n 0i2002 Expiration Date 03/102012 Introduction and Wealth Introduction Net Worth of client S Existin. JPAlo • an Client - Inside LOB 1.000.000.00 Additional Party Information No additonal parties available at this time Introduction Form of government issued identification obtained for the files ? Passport Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase CONFIDENTIAL JPM-SDNY-00002946 SDNY_GM_00272144 EFTA01480730

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.