Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01480735DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01480735

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01480735
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Business Name: (To Record Individual's Ownership Or Employer) a Primary Addresses Address (Legal address on account) Business Address (Other than Primary Address) Name: Attention: Address Line 1: 2 Kean Court Address Line 2: City: Livingston State: NJ Province: Postal/Zip Code: 07039 Country: UNITED STATES UNITED STATES Legal Entity: Individual / Joint Industry Code: PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS NAIC Code: 814100 Citizenship: UNITED STATES Date of Birth: 02/19/1965 (Use 4-digit year) Gender: Male Tax ID a: Remember to collect W-8's or other applicable tax forms for each jurisdiction. Passport/Drivers License #: Home Phone: O- Introduction Information Introduction Type: Other Specific Information: Darren Indyke Is the attorney for our client, Jeffrey Epstein. Met With Principal? Yes r No If you did not meet the Principal, give an indication of why you haven't met the individual and when you will. N/A What form of goverment issued Identification document did you obtain for the files? Driver's License Financial Information Occupation, Business or Employer Attorney of the Client: Net Worth of Client: S 3 (USD millions) Documentation/ Information obtained to confirm stated net worth of the Client: Annual salary plus value of personal residence Source Of Wealth: Executive Management/Professional Executive Management/Professional What is the client's current Attorney executive management position? (Include any former positions, If significant to source of wealth) List the number of years in current position. (Include any former positions, if significant to source of wealth) 16 Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase CONFIDENTIAL JPM-SDNY-00002951 SDNY_GM_00272149 EFTA01480735

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.