Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01614031DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01614031

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01614031
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Platform: iMessage Timezone: UTC+0000 L Lawrence 2018/09/17 Lawrence You free tomorrow at 430 pm eastern? L 05:22:59 am Lawrence III make it so 11:17:22 am Thanks. Also can you perhaps give me the name and phone number of one or two of the lawyers you have spoken to regarding action down the line. It would really help relieve Nancy's anger at the system if we could just talk to a few of them to see what the issues are. L 02:07:29 pm Not yet 02:07:49 pm Lawrence Ok. But we want to be prepared in advance for what may be necessary and for what may not. So at some point, ok? L 02:09:01 pin I am your friend. . lets focus on todays call 02:11:26 pm EFTA01614031 Lawrence K L 02:14:35 pm I would focus on that silly drawing they put into evidence . Its great example of over reach 02:18:35 pm There will be much time for anger. And years to think about retribution. The next three months are not the time 02:19:12 pm Lawrence I personally never want to be consumed by anger and bitterness. I have been screwed over on the past and my philosophy has always been that loving well is the best revenge. But anyway want Nancy to know that we will do something in long run. Talk later. L 02:26:41 pm Beware. On todays call I will say some neg things about your behavior . Its all theatre. For Justin 02:31:32 pm Lawrence Ok. He thinks we are talking about bill first. I should talk to him for 5 min about that and then bring you on? should I let him know in advance that we are all going to be taking about strategy? L 02:38:30 pm It should only be about strategy. Bill can wait. Tell him that I am available at 430 eastern and you'd like to c000diatnate strategy, did you send him anything questioning his bill yet/. Or mention it? 02:39:49 pin EFTA01614032 Lawrence I had sent him an email saying I had some questions about the bill on Thursday. That is when he said we should talk on Monday at 430 eastern. I can send him a note saying that I want to discuss strategy instead and you will be on the call if you want. My plan was to spend max 30 min on the call. That is $350. L 03:08:03 pm For me 10 minutes enough 03:08:35 pm Most of your calls. Is you talking, and paying to do so 03:08:55 pm Come to think of it , listening to you should cost you money I stand correted 03:09:17 pm Lawrence Ha! Well some people pay for it. Anyway how about I tell him that we all will be on the call for 10 min to talk about strategy and then you can leave the call and we can spend 10 min talking about the one item on the bill I was going to question. Or I could tell him we will talk about the bill later. L 03:10:58 pin tell him you only have 10 minutes . You will get to the bill later. You appreciate his advice. Blah blah. Why again do you want to make annoyed the people that you need on your side. 03:17:22 pm You wil want to review all the bills at the end. You are going to need him at the hearing. So why would you put him on notice that you don't want to pay now?!! 03:18:17 pin EFTA01614033 He will pull the same bull shit as. The last time. . do you want to fire me . All the time was spent ? I dint bill for much that you don't see. Always the same nonsense 03:19:15 pm I already reduced the bill . etc 03:19:29 pm Lawrence I just had one item I wanted to question. Ever since I had a come to Jesus talk with him he has been more forthcoming. It is just one item. Not the whole bill. Anyway I can forget that if you want. Just a $600 item. 03:20:35 pin I simply can't afford much more without some results. Have eaten into savings and santal has college next year. L 03:21:45 pm Do you see why I have lost my patience five times I have told you the same exact fucking thing. And at a least five time but almost each time I hear. BUT. 11. 03:21:57 pin you should have capped his fees. . mentioned them. You gave him work to do that you could have done better yourself. 03:22:36 pin Lawrence Water under the bridge at this point. What now? L 03:22:59 pm This is the rest of your life I have given you the answer , over over over and over. . and you again say." what now " this is how and why you are here. . you choose to ignore advice . Dictate your views on what should be as opposed to what is. it is 90 percent self inflicted wounds. You tell me now waht 03:24:31 pin EFTA01614034 Lawrence I am going to fill Justin in on events of the last few days before meeting. Letter from provost and info from committee member. I will let you know how I plan to bring you in on call in awhile. L 04:00:57 pm Just send him. , your explanation is not relevant 04:01:29 pm Lawrence Yes. 04:01:45 pin Ok 04:01:48 pin Done. L 04:56:14 pin S000 o disturbing that call. . I did not know about discussions re his fees. . sorry. Wow 10:11:58 pm 2018/09/18 Lawrence Thanks. I feel like I've been screwed twice in this process. At least once by my own doing. And that makes the whole thing so much worse. I can take being canned. But paying 2 years of college tuition to help it happen has been the hard part. 02:17:03 am EFTA01614035 Anyway, I am thinking of doing without a lawyer or with a local lawyer for the appeal part perhaps. The appeal doc plus two addendums do most of what the witnesses might do and I could call one or two of the faculty involved who weren't really interviewed by OEI, to talk about the real atmosphere at origins and what really happened in our meetings (especially Manfred Laubichler) and then stress what I put at the beginning of the appeal document. Namely not a single faculty post doc or one of my students or attendees at any of our origins conferences ever filed any complaints-that as a professor, researcher, and teacher my record at asu is not tainted. 02:18:01 am I forgot to tell you that Justin also suggested that if conciliation fails we ask university why we couldn't have done mediation which is interesting because of course mediation is one of the allowed options. Justin said he asked the general counsel about this earlier and she said they basically never do mediation. L 10:23:18 pm hes a moron. it. Thats it 10:24:25 pin It says in essence if the university wants to try it it can suggest So it is allowed under the regs. 10:24:41 pm Lawrence Yeah I know. L 10:24:55 pin Can I call you 10:25:19 pm Lawrence On phone. Will text when done. L 10:26:12 pin EFTA01614036 2018/09/23 Lawrence Interesting day. I just went on 23 and me as I have a new dna relative in the list. My brother Michael. I just discovered he is my half brother!!! Ha! We share only 25% dna, not 50%. I am boring 100% ashenazi Jew. But mike is a mongrel. Don't know who his father is. :). Spoke to my mom and she said he was immaculately conceived. :))). Wow. Then she said he was a test tube baby. I told her they didn't have test tube babies then. :))). My mother said I am the krauss. I asked what she would tell mike and she said she would tell him the same thing. :: Well that is eye opening. 03:05:39 am Does that make my brother a bastard? L 03:07:13 am V Read Yup 10:29:03 am v Sent EFTA01614037

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.