Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01648786DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01648786

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01648786
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From T C Subject: Re: Financials and SARs Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:22:50 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: GMSARsummaries.docx Sir, FBI identified 19 SARs filed on Maxwell with an association to Epstein. See attached (3) SAR summary examples. FBI FOA provided SDNY with seven financial trial exhibits utilized in the Maxwell trial. SDNY called a representative from JP Morgan Bank to testify. Excerpt from SDNY closing statements: That brings us to the seventh reason that you know Maxwell is guilty. It's the money. Now, we've already talked about Epstein's luxurious lifestyle and all of the perks that Maxwell got from being his partner in crime, but it wasn't just getting to live in the mansions and flying on the private jets, maxwell got millions of dollars from Epstein. You learned that between 1999 and 2007, Jeffrey Epstein gave Maxwell about $30 million, and you know exactly what that money was for. First, in 1999, Epstein sent Maxwell $18.3 million. $18.3 million — here's the transaction. And then, in 2002, Epstein paid Maxwell $5 million — here's the transaction. And, last but not least, in 2007, Epstein paid Maxwell $7.4 million. $18.3 million, $5 million, $7.4 million. It's a total of $30.7 million. At this point, you got to ask yourselves, what was Maxwell doing for Epstein that was worth more than $30 million? Your common sense tells you that you don't give someone $30 million unless they're giving you exactly what you want, and what Epstein wanted was to touch underage girls. When Maxwell took that money, she knew what it was for and now you do, too. It was payment for committing terrible crimes with Jeffrey Epstein. From: Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 5:22 PM To: Subject: Financials and SARs Anything to note re Epstein or Maxwell re financials or SARs from the case? EFTA01648786

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.