Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01682023DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01682023

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01682023
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of Lesley Groff "Client" and her attorne , Michael Bachner, Esq., with Assistant United States Attorney to be held on July 23, 2021 ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (I) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive from justice. (3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or issues raised sua sponte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client (4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018. (5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects. EFTA01682023 (6) If this Office receives a request from another prosecutor's office for access to information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Office may furnish such information but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this Agreement. (7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. (8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs I through 7 above extend to the continuation of this meeting on the dates that appear below. (9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof. Dated: New York, New York 7.02. i • Dates of Continuation AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York by: Assistant United States Attorney Initials of counsel, Client, AUSA, witness 2020.12)1 EFTA01682024

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

WIKIPED I

WIKIPED I A EP sre (4 s Ex-CAL- A 80s6 n. Jeffrey Epstein RtNCA Jeffrey Edward Epstein (/'spsti:n/ EP-steen;Egi- January 20, 1953 - August 10, 2019) was an American financier and convicted sex offender.[3][4] Epstein, who was born and raised in Brooklyn, New York City, began his professional life by teaching at the Dalton School in Manhattan, despite lacking a college degree. After his dismissal from the school, he entered the banking and finance sector, working at Bear Stearns in various roles; he eventually started his own firm. Epstein developed an elite social circle and procured many women and children; he and some of his associates then sexually abused thentiskall.61[71 In 2005, police in Palm Beach, Florida, began investigating Epstein after a parent complained that he had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter.(81 Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute

44p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01682023

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5119122. 3152

5119122. 3152 PM iV; L c ol g or yeR - cioveizN. riccsr nc — C I Ka • inceNT eaDA)E Jeffrey Epstein - Widpedla FRM CC- AOST Epstein a massage" She claims she was taken to his mansion, , Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.a9--6I A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer. -2.1 These and several similar lawsuits were dismis,sed.ing All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.fml Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.11T-4 aiCE PS/6 — MAXWELL - SC'cUAL i\ k.)3C RINC44 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) C)(4 R L tql3Q•sC at egejt-ttiV POS I C. t\CS A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims', Rig

70p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Pt.h. Co; g

Pt.h. Co; g - CtrzakERN frlet4T Pk0.57 i-rotic 5/19/22, 3:52 PM Jeffrey Epstein - Wildpedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, ;Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with i November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward. 106 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.j1221 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.' CU All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of courtP311 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.W-21 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) 56cOn L ne5066 at epomioet.ri post-I-IONA% A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department ofJustice's NPA with Epstein and his limited 2008 state plea.

70p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

511922.4:19 PM

511922.4:19 PM M PN)CV,SeLL Ghislaine Maxwell - Wikipedia Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein Accounts differ on when Maxwell first met American financier Jeffrey Epstein. According to Epstein's former business partner, Steven Hoffenbe Robert Maxwell introduced his daughter to Epstein in the late 198Os. The limes reported that Maxwell met Epstein in the early 199O5 at a New York party following "a difficult break-up with Count Gianfranco Cicogna Mozzoni" (1962-2012) of the CIGA Hotels Maxwell had a romantic relationship with Epstein for several years in the early 1990s and remained closely associated with him for more than 25 years until his death in 2019.[2211481[511 The nature of their relationship remains unclear. In a 2009 deposition, several of Epstein's household employees testified that Epstein referred to her as his "main girlfriend" who also hired, fired, and supervised his staff, starting around 1992.M She has also been referred to as the "Lady of the House

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.