Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01733867DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01733867

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01733867
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PT/BC/ 13 March 2011 Telegraph Media Group Ltd., 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London SWIW ODT. FAO: The Editor. The Daily Telegraph cc Arthur Wynn Davies. Legal Manager — A rthu r.wvnn-davies tele ra Dear Sirs, We have been consulted by Jeffrey Epstein in relation to your grossly inaccurate and persistent references to him being a "paedophile", in particular in your editions of 7'" and 10th March under the headlines "Duchess of York admits Duke arranged for convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein to pay off her debts" and "The Duke, his paedophile guest, and the most unusual use of an RAF base" respectively, and on your website. Our client is not, as your headline article alleges, a convicted paedophile. Although he has been convicted of soliciting prostitutes, and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution, he has served his time for that offence ....While in the UK, as you are aware, the age of consent is 16, in the United States it is 18. This young woman was just a few months shy of her 18th birthday. Thus, the offence for which Mr. Epstein was convicted of in the U.S. would not have been a crime in the UK. Furthermore, the false and distorted terminology used by you to describe our client in your vitriolic attack on his character is in stark contrast to your coverage of the recent scandal involving Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, where we can find no reference in your reports to him being described as a paedophile in the face of similar charges. We cite this example not by way of condoning either our client's nor PM Berlusconi's PAST actions (the allegations against Mr. Epstein all antedated the fall of 2005) but to highlight the outrageous and totally unjustified description of our client as a "paedophile" which simply is not true on any interpretation of the word. He has not been convicted nor been accused of being a "paedophile", a pejorative that has a very specific medical definition', apart from by certain elements of the tabloid press in their recent reports on his friendship with Prince Andrew. Our client however should be entitled to expect more accurate and credible reporting from a respected broadsheet such as the Daily Telegraph, which is supposed to have significantly higher standards of reporting than the tabloids known for their sensationalised and exaggerated reporting. Pedophilia is defined "As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia (or paedophilia) is typically defined as a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 and older) characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty may vary)." (Wikipedia) EFTA_R1_00010112 EFTA01733867 Our client is entitled, at the very least, to the publication of an express clarification and apology, in terms to be first agreed with us, as a matter of some urgency. We would therefore be grateful to receive your proposals in this regard, while our client continues to reserve all his rights in relation to, in particular, what would be a totally justified Complaint to the PCC, together with a claim for defamation and malicious falsehood. We look forward to hearing from you by return. Yours faithfully, JOHNSONS EFTA_R1_00010113 EFTA01733868

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference
Wire Refreferences

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01364228

0p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alleged testimony that Jeffrey Epstein paid a 17‑year‑old $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew and flew other young women for similar encounters

The passage links Jeffrey Epstein to a claim that a witness was paid $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 and mentions additional flights of young women for sexual purposes. It provides sp Witness alleges she was flown to London by Epstein and paid $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew at a Epstein allegedly arranged flights for other young women for sexual encounters Bradley Edwards is

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Anecdotal recollections linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers

The passage offers personal impressions and vague connections but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions well‑known figures, but only in a speculative, go Author claims to have met Epstein and Maxwell at parties and describes their behavior. Mentions Prince Andrew walking with Epstein and suggests a possible business‑related motive. References financie

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01837146

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.