Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01734415DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01734415

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01734415
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
JAN-11-10 15:26 FROM-LE0P0L0NNUYIN, P.A. T-791 P 001/001 F-366 LEOPOLD-KUVIN„ CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS January 11, 2010 THIS LETTER IS SENT PURSUANT TO FLA. STAT. §90.408, AND IS CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS Via Fax and Mail Robert Critton, Esq. Burman Critton, et. al. 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Epstein Dear Mr. Crinon: As you may know by now, my firm represents Please advise no later than February 8, 2010, as to whether your client wou 1 amicably resolve this matter without the need for the filing of a lawsuit. Sincerely, (Sit ed in is absence to avoid delay) SP. CER 1'. KUV1N STK:mlb 2925 PGA WOUI0.4111:1 Soho 200 Pisan &ham Caecient Fionoa 3341a laimpAnk.rdn.con, °IASI 'WOK! H IN ESS • MANAGED CARE Ameir • CONSUMER CLA:IS ACTIONS PERSONAL INJURY • WRONGFUL DEATH EFTA R1 00012548 EFTA01734415

Related Documents (5)

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition excerpt shows heated exchange among attorneys with no substantive allegations

The passage is a routine courtroom deposition transcript featuring lawyers arguing over procedure. It contains no names of influential actors, no financial or misconduct details, and offers no actiona The excerpt records a dispute between attorneys (Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold) about taking No mention of any high‑profile individuals, agencies, or controversial actions. The content is pro

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728716

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling

The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.