Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01734603DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01734603

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01734603
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
305-9312200 Herman &Mermelsteln, P 03:04:45p.m. 02-04-2010 7/15 Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 6 11. Please identify your five closest friends for the years 2006 — 2010, including their full name, current address, home telephone number and cellular telephone number. ANSWER: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, an unwarranted invasion of privacy and not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving said objections, Plaintiff states: 1. 2. 3. 4. Plaintiff does not have a fifth person that she would consider "a close friend" during that time period. 12. Do you intend to call at trial other females who went to Mr. Epstein's residence? If so, please identify each individual, including their name, current address, home telephone number and cellular telephone number, and identify her counsel. Also, please state the substance of each witness's testimony. Answer: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, cumulative, and calling for speculation. Subject to and without waiving said objections, Plaintiff states: EFTA_R1_00012990 EFTA01734603 305-9312200 Herman &Mermelsteln, P 03:04:58 p.m. 02-04-2010 8/15 Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 7 Plaintiff has not yet identified all of the witnesses she intends to call at trial. The witnesses who went to Epstein's residence include: Jane Doe No. 2 Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A., While still a minor, Jane Doe No. 2 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by Jane Doe No. 3 wherein she was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein in a manner during a massage wherein she was paid $200.00. See transcript of Jane Doe No. 2's deposition. Jane Doe No. 4 Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. r, Jane Doe No. 4 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by an agent and employee of Defendant Epstein, wherein she was repeatedly sexually assaulted during the course of a massage wherein she was paid $200.00 for each sexual assault. Additionally, •• at s n rail called by Defendant Epstein's employees, nd when Defendant Epstein wanted Jane Doe No. 4 to come to his ome for sexual activity. See transcript of Jane Doe No. 4's deposition. Jane Doe No. 5 Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A., As a minor, Jane Doe No. 5 went to Defendant Epstein's home as the result of a conversation with an agent of Defendant Epstein who attended school with Jane Doe No. 5. While at Defendant Epstein's home, she was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein during the course of a massage wherein she was paid $200.00. See transcript of Jane Doe No. 5's deposition. Jane Doe No. 6 Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. As a minor, Jane Doe No. 6 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by- to provide him with a massage. During the course of the massage, she was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein and was paid $200.00. See transcript of Jane Doe No. 6's deposition. Jane Doe No. 7 Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. As a mino oe No. 7 was brought to Defendant Epstein by his employee and agent to give Defendant Epstein a massage. She was also on the telephone y Defendant Epstein's agent and employee, when Defendant Epstein wanted her to come to his home for a ma unng the course of the massages, Jane Doe No. 7 was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein. She was paid $200.00 each time. See transcript of Jane Doe No. 7's deposition. EFTA_R1_00012991 EFTA01734604 305-9312200 Herman &IVIermelstoin, P 03:05:19 p.m. 02-04-2010 9115 Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 8 Jane Doe No. 8 Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. As a minor, Jane Doe No. 8 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home byM to give Defendant Epstein a massage. During the course of the massage, Defendant Epstein sexually assaulted Jane Doe No. 8. She was paid $200.00 for the massage/sexual assault. Home address unknown do Ma Esq. Upon information and belief, was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by his employee and/ li t to give Defendant Epstein a massage wherein he mo sexually assaulted n at least one occasion. She ' testify that she knew Jane oe No. 6 and introduced her to who brought Jane Doe No. 6 to Defendant Epstein's home for a massage. Jane Doe Home address unknown doMa Esq. Upon information and belief, Jane Doe was invited or bought to Defendant Epstein's home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted Jane Doe on at least one occasion. See transcript of Jane Doe's deposition. Ho ess unknown do Esq. Upon Information and belief, was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by his employee and/66Nant to give Defendant Epstein a massage wherein he sexually assaulted on at least on occasion. She will also likely testify that she knew Jane Doe No. 6 and brought Jane Doe No. 6 to Epstein's home at his re uest and that Defendant Epstein paid her to bring other girls. See transcript o deposition. nown c/ Esq. home by agent/employell give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted on at least one occasion. She will also likely testify that she was Upon i nd belief, was bought or Invited to Defendant Epstein's paid by Defendant Epstein to recruit and bring other underage girls to his home for "massages" wherein he sexually assaulted the underage girls. See transcript of deposition. mo e Address Unknown EFTA_R1_00012992 EFTA01734605 305-9312200 Herman &Mermelsteln, P 03:05:37 p.m. 02-04-2010 10/15 Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 9 c/o Esq. Upon in ormation and belief was bought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted C.M.A. on at least one occasion. She will also likely testify that she was paid by Defendant Epstein to recruit and bring other underage girls to his home for " " wherein he sexually assaulted the underage girls. See transcript adeposition. Home address unknown Upon information and belief, was bought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home to ' a massage by his agent/employee wherein he sexually assaulted n at least one occasion. She will also likely testify that she was paid by Defendant Epstein to recruit and bring other underage girls to his home for "massages" wherein he sexually assaulted the underage iris, in I in but not limited to, Jane Doe Nos., 3, 4, and 7. See transcript of deposition. Jane Doe No. 101 Hos...known do Esq. Upon information and belief, Jane Doe No. 101 was invited or bought to Defendant Epstein's home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted Jane Doe No. 101 on at least one occasion. Jane Doe No. 102 Ho dress unknown do Esq. Upon information and belief, Jane Doe No. 102 was invited or bought to Defendant Epstein's home by his agenVemployee to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted Jane Doe 102 on at least one occasion. Ja do Esq. Upon Information and belief, Jane Doe No. 103 was invited or bought to Defendant Epstein's by his agent/employee home to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted Jane Doe 103 on at least one occasion. do sq. D.D. went with Jane Doe No. 5 to Defendant Epstein's home to give him a massage wherein she was sexually assaulted. Upon information and belief, she was also brought/invited to Defendant Epstein's home on su ent occasions to give him a massage wherein she was sexually assaulted. will also likely testify that she was still a minor when the sexual assaults occurred. EFTA_R1_00012993 EFTA01734606 305-9312200 Herman diMermelpteln, P 03:05:56p.m. 02-04-2010 11 PIS Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 10 MEI Home address unknown Esq. is likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted her on at least one occasion. She will likely testify that she was still a minor when the sexual assault(s) occurred. Home address unknown is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 5 and , and knew them to have gone to Defendant Eptein's home on at least one occasion to give him a masszas and that they stated Defendant Epstein touched them in a sexual manner. EN is likely to testify that she too went to Defendant Epstein's home to give him a massage and during the course of that massage, Defendant Epstein touched her in sexual manner while she was still a minor. Home address unknown is likely to testify that she was repeatedly sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein at his home during the course of massages. She is also likely to testify that Defendant Epstein forced her to engage in sexual intercourse with him against her will, and that she was forced to engage in sexual activity with Epstein's employee/agent, , against her will. She is likely to testify that she was a minor w en ese evens occurred. Home Address Unknown is likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by his employee/agent to give Defendant Efil a massage wherein she was sexually assaulted on at least one occasion. is likely to testify that she was a minor when these events occurred. Home address unknown is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe Nos. 3, 4, and 7, and knew them to go to Defendant Epstein's home to give him massages. She is also likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by an agent of Defendant Epstein to give him a massage wherein she was sexually assaulted. She is likely to testify that these events occurred when she was a minor. Il e address unknown is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 3 and knew Jane Doe No. 3 to have gone to Defendant Epstein's home to give him a massage. EFTA_R1_00012994 EFTA01734607 305-9312200 Herman drhAermelsteln, P 03:06:15 p.m. 02-04-2010 12/15 Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 11 is also likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by his agent to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted her. She is also likely to testify that these events occurred when she was a minor. is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 3 during the riod, and that she was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by to give him a massage wherein he touched her in a sexual manner. She is also likely to testify that she was a minor when these events occurred. is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 7 and was brought to Defendant Epstein's house to provide him with a massage, wherein she was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein. She is also likely to testify that she was a minor when these events occurred. Esq. is likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by his agent or employee to give him a massage wherein she was sexually assaulted on at least one occasion. She is likely to testify that she was a minor when these events occurred. Jane Doe II Ad wn AEI Esq. Jane Doe I is likely to testify that she was brought to or invited to Defendant Epstein's home by his agent or employee to give him a massage wherein she was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein. She is also likely to testify that she was a minor when these events occurred. EFTA_R1_00012995 EFTA01734608

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone305-9312200

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 3

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO JOIN UNDER RULE 21 AND MOTION TO AMEND UNDER RULE 15 This cause is before the Court on Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4's Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action ("Rule 21 Motion") (DE 280), and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their Pleadings to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as Petitioners ("Rule 15 Motion") (DE 311). Both motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that they should be denied. I. Background This is an action by two unnamed petitioners, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, seeking to prosecute a claim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 377

10p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01695623

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01308033

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.