Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01735430DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01735430

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01735430
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
WIGGIN tots flax Aid Binkkrtt 22 PM" 5t'CCI 1.9,40n WIT 13k) itlelhent *44 Dna Wet: Man. r.:t. a BY FAX AND POST Our ref: Your ref: 10 may 2011 Johnsons 21 Arlington London SW1A 1BN Dear Sirs YOUR CLIEN CMK/jcd PT/DW/ME00010029 treet JEFFREY EPSTEIN we act for t e publishers of Tatter: our clients have passed to us your letter dated 5 May 2011 and we reply on their behalf. As you cone 18 for prosti damages. H tabloid press While the ve primary or interest in c pubescent correct. In the circa client's corn your client, de In your letter, your client has been convicted of soliciting prostitutes, and procuring a person under ution. He is on Americas sex offenders register. He has been served with a number of civil claims for has, as you note, been widely described as a 'paedophile throughout the media • not simply in the rd 'paedophilia' as a medical diagnosis is defined as a psychiatric disorder typically characterised by elusive sexual interest in pre-pubescent children, in popular usage. paedophilia means any sexual Ildren. This common application extends to sexual interest in and abuse of pubescent or post- inors. In common parlance, therefore, the use of the word 'paedophile to describe your client Is stances, our clients are not prepared to agree to the publication of a clarification or an apology. Your taint has, however, been noted and In the event that our clients publish any further material concerning our clients points will be borne In mind. Your, faithf Ily /1 1838597_1. DpC Sys:. kq,n MK CI Valli 'MEI SWAMI owl vism • wp Ceavoted • Astai te Silva • Sean inn . Adr[v• NIOCI • CM0 At QM Maar. :book Mina Medea •Clia.9.2 Mwit O. Altsild0 Mit • 'AMA IVA•IsIt 1001111tert• Asia Mar Snow Awaii ‘‘) . Wig PIAUI SbIlfr• d Phy Su.oer at. (Miµbtt Cansult•ntl' Stith I' • MOS Users tat *.,Ti awn -Pett, MiirANIP itgir .fiftifel y n1 411411 M ntrSI4 and Wain oil'. IM ..-7 a..ed1 van , nrioni., anises Wit 95 The Note .t...hrs.m.. liaantsleakirg Otto) iviri 61.91 9 0 II TT 02 /SO/EI EFTA_R1_00018823 10/TO abed vow% UP n minis be Mt SplicAvr,' Popalitga. Aflity a.1 a EFTA01735430

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.