Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01735521DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01735521

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01735521
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-81111-CIV-DIMITROULEAS MJ., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the Complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all Defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this order. It is further ORDERED: 1. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and Southern District of Florida Local Rule 16.1. 2. Within thirty-five (35) calendar days of the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, unless this action is excluded under Rule 26(aX1)(B), the parties shall file a Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Proposed Order pursuant to Local Rule 16.113.22 In preparing the Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Proposed Order the parties shall adhere to the following deadlines: A. The parties must confer within fifteen (15) calendar days after the filing of the This time period is inclusive of the additional time provided pursuant to Rule 6(d). EFTA_R1_00019456 EFTA01735521 Case 9:10-Cv-81111-WPD Document 4 Entered on FLSD DoCket 09/21/2010 Page 2 of 3 first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(aX1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(0. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference outlining the proposed discovery plan at the time they file their Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Proposed Order. B. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as the discovery conference described in Rule 26(f) or within ten (10) calendar days thereafter. See Local Rule 16.1.B. C. Within seven (7) calendar days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1.B. This report shall indicate the. proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required. Should this be a case in which a class is sought, the report shall include a date by which any motions for class certifications shall be filed. D. The Court notes that, pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, parties are required to agree upon a mediator and advise the Clerk's office of their choice within fourteen(14) days of this Court issuing a Scheduling Order. 3. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the scheduling conference report. However, unilateral submissions are prohibited. 4. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. EFTA_R1_00019457 EFTA01735522 Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2010 Page 3 of 3 5. If a case is settled, counsel are directed to inform the Court promptly at (954) 769- 5650, and to submit an appropriate stipulation Order for Dismissal, pursuant to Rule 41(aX1) . Such an Order must be filed within ten (10) calendcr days of notification of the Court. DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 21st day of September, 2010. P. 1511.41TR Meted Suttee Didrict Judge Copies furnished to: Bradley I. Edwards EFTA_R1_00019458 EFTA01735523

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:10-CV-81111-WPD

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeCorrespondenceUnknown

Telephone message logs: DOJ-OGR-00032705

This document contains logs of telephone messages for various individuals, including Jeff, Mr. Epstein (potentially Jeffrey Epstein), and Sarah, on July 26, 2017. The messages indicate calls, requests to call back, and potential follow-up actions. The document is labeled with a 'Public Records Request No.' suggesting it was obtained through a public records request.

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Document alleges phone and private‑plane records link Jeffrey Epstein to sexual encounters with underage girls in Palm Beach, supporting probable‑c...

The passage provides concrete investigative leads – subpoenaed private‑plane logs, cell‑phone call logs, and specific dates tying Epstein’s flights to alleged victim contact. It implicates a high‑prof Subpoena obtained Epstein’s 2005 private‑plane records from Jet Aviation showing arrivals/departures Cell‑phone records of a witness (Sarah Kellen) show calls to victims and a person named Dobbs made

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01835168

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.