Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01745676DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01745676

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01745676
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Noam Chomsky" Illa To: "Jeffrey E" [email protected]> Subject: RE: Sent Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:45:35 PM It's not hard to add probability and other factors to automata and recursive function theory. Sometimes it's done, e.g., Shannon's studies of provability with probabilistic automata. It's very rarely done because of irrelevance. The deep problems are not advanced in any way that's known by bringing in these considerations. Just as one doesn't bring in energy or time in studying number theory. Back to the origins of modern science there's been controversy about studying ideal systems vs real world interactions. Galileo had a devilish time convincing the funders (aristocrats) that it made sense to study balls rolling down non-existent frictionless planes when it is so much more interesting to watch flowers grow and figure out how they do it. The modern sciences finally developed as it became clearer that if you ever want to study "real world interactions" in a revealing way, you'd better base the inquiry on what can be learned from "ideal forms of relationships" and by exploring the limits of current understanding. True across the board, including vision and language. With current Big Data options there are widespread beliefs that something serious can be learned by virtually brute force methods. Very common now, and I doubt that much will come of it. Rather like trying to find the laws of motion not as science did from Galileo on but by taking a huge number of videotapes of what's happening outside the window, storing them in an immense data bank, and using statistical analysis. From: Jeffrey E. (mailto:[email protected] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:38 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: I have lot of work to do. but it appear obvious to me that both automaton and recursive theory, totally ignore . time entropy and energy, ( probabiltiy ?) so while they might describe in mathmatically mastabatory terms some ideal forms of relationships. and some I admit very beautiful, the very small subset of real world interactions should be our focus. . please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by c-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00038563 EFTA01745676

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.