Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01751609DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01751609

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01751609
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2014 7:57:52 PM Subject: Re: Apollo From: Richard Joslin <a> To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation grnail.com> Cc: Eileen Alexanderson As an update, I have received from Tom T. a copy of the K-1's issued by BRH to Black Family Partners from 2008 to 2012 and interest expense is shown by Apollo tax dept as "investment interest expense." I will see the 2007 reporting on Monday.and look to see what the entity expenditutes were. As noted below, tracing may not be an issue based on the reporting. On Sat. Dec 28. 2013 at 11:57 AM, Richard Joslin wrote: > AMH distributed $1.2B in 2007. AMH had the option to treat either 1) treat > the distribution as entirely debt financed (partners trace 100% of cash) or > 2) trace expenditures inside of AMH FY 2007 and allocate interest expense to > the manner of AMH's expenditures (ignoring any debt distributed). AMH To > the extent the expendtures inside AMH were less than the debt financed > distribution, the excess of amount of debt distributed over the > expendtitures traces by AMH would be traced by the use by the partners. > Looking at the 2008 S-1 filed, the AOG showed compensation expenses greater > than $1.2B however management company income/advisory revenue was $340MM. > Point is it is hard to discern what were AMH expenditures exactly in 2007. > If AMH expenditures were substantial then much of the interest expense would > ostensibly be management company related since AMH expenditures are such. > Based on 2012 K-1 reporting for the interest, Apollo treated the interest as > "investment interest" and reported on the K-1 line 13H. Notice 89-35 which > is IRS guidance on debt financed distributions indicates that under the > tracing approach, interest expense is separately stated as an other > deduction K-1 Line 13W. Given that AMH is operating an advisory business/ > fund management, the characterization as solely investment is to be noted, > but most notable is that no amount is reported as trade or business, > Clearly the reporting follows the second method above which I would maintain > is the option selected. The only item for review is AMH's gross > expenditures in 2007 (pre and post distribution). > Richard Joslin > Black Family Partners, LP > c/o Apollo Mana ement Richard Joslin, CPA EFTA_R1_00049811 EFTA01751609 CFO Black Famil Partners, LP EFTA_R1_00049812 EFTA01751610

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domaingrnail.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.