Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01763756DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01763756

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01763756
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Steven Sinofsky Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 1:34 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: agreement Ok. Ball is in jays court. On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:31 AM, "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: send an agreement that you would sign after they negotiate you on some meaningless provsions . On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Steven Sinofsky la wrote: ok. I agree. Will talk to Jay. if the agreement is not petty then we have to think about PR -- there's no money worth going through another round of steve's orchestrated stuff. The damage was real - not just emotional and in my own head. Sent from Windows Mail From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: February 22, 2013 7:34 PM To: Steven Sinofsky Subject: Re: agreement cooperation should suggest 18months but give if need be, i want items left to negotiate. no not petty, but i want to see the agreemnt with respect to vesting your stock, immediatley, we will give a lock up for period of time if need be . any other non money terms are irrelvant. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Steven Sinofsky > wrote: Jay wants to do a blackline of the terms as they promised so as not to look random or not genuine in terms of the flow of discussions. I think that is ok and brad does work that way. THey want to send this and follow up with financials Monday as we talked about. They like the idea but think that they will still focus on $15M. lam trying to get them to see that this is about disclosure and precedence. To me, this agreement reads like Microsoft is petty -- do you think so? I mean telling me not to work at VMware, EMC or Oracle is funny because I have no expertise there! I told them: EFTA_R1_00070487 EFTA01763756 Non solicitation seemed a bit too wordy and too much Not to add confidentiality ourselves Cooperation should also be 12 months Sent from Windows Mail The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_00070488 EFTA01763757

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.