Case File
efta-01784888DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01784888
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01784888
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Joscha Bach <
Sent:
Wednesday, August 24, 2016 4:48 PM
To:
Jeffrey Epstein
Subject:
Re:
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 06:09, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
> do you believe a bunch of chemicalls has a goal, ?
It depends a bit on how we use the words; do you think that a bunch of =hemicals can do mathematics or be money? I
think it makes sense to say =yes".
A goal is part of a causal model that we use to describe a agent that =an commit to pursuing a world state. Outside of
this model, the word =as no meaning. Within the model, it makes the behavior of some bunches =f chemicals somewhat
predictable on a particular level.
I think most chemical systems do not have goals, in the sense that we =annot meaningfully ascribe to them that they
have agency. For that, =hey need
- some kind of preference system,
- a way to determine and represent world states,
- a way to make decisions for world states based on the preferences,
- a way to act on decisions so that the preferred world state becomes =ore likely.
For instance, a corporation is an agent in this sense, and a cat is too. =erhaps George Church would say that cells can
have goals, too.
A Roomba cleaning robot is a particularly good example: when it cleans =he room, it has no goal, because it has no
model of the cleanliness of =he room, and no preference to make it cleaner. We can test for this: if =ts dirt container is
full, it will happily make a clean room more =irty, because it just moves randomly around while rotating its brushes. =he
cleaning is an emergent result.
On the other hand, when it runs low on battery, it will explicitly =earch for its power station and drive there to recharge,
and after =hat, it will continue cleaning. It explicitly represents the charging =tate, and when starved for power, it
commits to a goal that makes it =irect its actions on entering that state.
Valentino Braitenberg, in his classical book "vehicles", looks at =ifferent kinds of cybernetic feedback systems, and at
different kinds =f agency that can be implemented in them. My own thinking is mostly =haped by the ideas of social
agency, by the Italian computer scientist =ristiano Castelfranchi, and by Aaron Sloman.
>
isnt that in your words just one of the stories we tell =urselves.? why is it not merely chemicals
I would say that a goal is part of a "software specification". Nature =an get a bunch of chemicals to enact this
specification. But it can =lso be done mechanically, electrically or socially.
> . like in a magnetic field forced to line up with other chemcilas =n the vicinity, . more hike magnets lining up.
Do you think there is a lowest level, and that it makes sense to =peculate what it is?
EFTA_R1_00106576
EFTA01784888
Fundamental physics explores the idea of the lowest causally closed =eve'. I made an online survey during the FQXi
conference, and got 49 =esponses from the participants. 18 believed that the universe is =undamentally just
mathematics or information (8 of those think it is =ust information). 19 believe in a material universe (4 of those think
=nly space or spacetime exists). 15 respondents hold that a conscious =bserver or God is necessary (some of them
overlap with the =aterialists).
For what its worth, the idea that only information is real does not seem =o be especially strange. What is your
view/intuition?
You are right when you say that my view is strongly influenced by being = computer scientist. Once I made the leap that
our observations of the =orld are fundamentally not different from what a computer game player =an observer on his
screen, and that we can produce every conceivable =equence of observations via a computer program, I saw no way out
again, =specially after I got to see observers/minds as computer programs, too. =verything we know about ourselves, we
know through sequences of =bservations, too, and observations are sets of discernible differences == bits of
information).
Cheers,
Joscha
<?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd">
<plist version=.0">
<dict>
<key>date-last-viewed</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>date-received</key>
<integer>1472057283</integer>
<key>flags</key>
<integer>8590195717</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>
<array>
<integer>2</integer>
<integer>22</integer>
</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>638544</string>
</dict>
</plist>
2
EFTA_R1_00106577
EFTA01784889
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]URL
http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtdRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02679857
10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Ben Goertzel
21p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01784888
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Joscha Bach cfl.
2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
To: "Gerald Lefcourt" <6
From: To: "Gerald Lefcourt" <6 Cc: "Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" Bcc: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:22:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 070910_Epstein_Non-Prosecution_Agreement.pdf Gerry: As per your discussion with U.S. Attorney Acosta, I have attached the Office's written counterproposal. If you have any questions regarding its terms, please do not hesitate to call. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00215324
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01839811
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.