Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01798807DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01798807

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01798807
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Warwick Wicksman <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:12 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: RE: Main Residence and Flagpole Pool Yes. (310) 449-5790 = = &n=sp; &nbs=; Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal 310.449.5790 &nbs=; &=bsp; &nbs=; Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.com <http://www.gensle=.com/> Click here to view Gensler'= 2010 Annual Report. <http://www.gensle=.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_02_18_2011.pdf> From: Jeffrey =pstein imailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 9:06 AM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: Main Residence and Flagpole Pool can we speak On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Warwick Wicksman &l=;warwick_wicksman@gensler.=om <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: Jeffrey and Gary, We need to address a couple of issues =n how we are proceeding with the Main Residence and the Flagpole Pool. Main Residence: EFTA_R1_00137002 EFTA01798807 It looks like we are getting close to = final conceptual layout. Some of the comments we are seeing are prog=ammatic in nature — massing and basic heights — appropriate fo= where we are in the design process. But some are too detail- oriente= for the phase we are in right now — railing details, roof spring lines, hardscape patterns, etc. Those need to be studied=after concept is done. We need to step the back a bit, and get basic=concept resolved, before we launch into the next level of design. Here is what I propose for the Main Re=idence: * = We need to focus on the scheme with the =errace at 44' and the switch-back stair. We can still adjust a=l of the elevations and stepping, but it sounds like the scheme with the s=raight run stairs from the main residence down (+47' version) was not preferred. * = We need to look at a couple a couple of =asic options for where the living room floor elevation; +42c;, +44', +47', etc. = We need to review the basic levels of th= stepped terraces, and include the views from the bedroom area. * = We need to take the photo-realistic patt=rns off the model, and just show the massing. I think the stone patt=rn is distracting our focus. The finishes and details for this (ston= vs. plaster walls, railing/wall details, etc.) would be part of the next design phase. Flagpole Pool: Jeffrey, I need to understand from you=how you want to proceed with this flagpole pool area. It looks as if=it is going to be built, before we have a chance to complete the design it! I do not want risk of that happeni=g, and your being dissatisfied with the end design. At this point, w= have almost completed the concept, incorporating what we discussed during=our work session last week (outdoor living room for cabanas with low sloped roofs, revised approach, etc), into the d=sign. We need to do to send you the new model views, which we can do=once the Main Residence is resolved. However, we are now being asked=to draft the pool building so it can be fast-tracked and built! Aside from this not being part of our scope of work, I ne=d to emphasize that this building has not been designed yet. We just=have a conceptual layout. For example, we proposed one large sliding glass=door facing the pool, centered on the main axis. Now we are told to make it two smaller ones, due to shipping a=d storm protection. That may not be the right solution — cente= point on that wall being a post. One smaller slider with two window= may be a more appropriate solution. We also do not know what the interior looks like, especially the bathroom. Here is what I propose for the Flagpol= Pool: * = Let us finish concept, including a revis=d west elevation for the pool building. When that is done, we will p=epare design drawings — floor and roof plan, basic elevations, basic=sections. Then you can have your local engineer do the structural portions for the permits. Jeffrey, please send me your comments =n this. Tom and team are currently addressing your notes from yester=ay on the design. 2 EFTA_R1_00137003 EFTA01798808 Thanks, Warwick &nbs=; &n=sp; &nbs=; <=r> Warwick Wicksman= AIA Principal 310.449.5790 <tel:310.449.5790> =nbsp; &nb=p; =nbsp; &nb=p; Gensler </roan> 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.com <http://www.=ensler.com/> Cli=k here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. <http://www.r.ensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_02_18_2011.pdf> ***** ******** ******** sits♦* ********* ************************ The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 3 EFTA_R1_00137004 EFTA01798809

Technical Artifacts (10)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.gensler.com
Phone(310) 449-5790
Phone310.449.5790
URLhttp://www.=ensler.com
URLhttp://www.Gensler.com
URLhttp://www.gensle=.com
URLhttp://www.gensle=.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_02_18_2011.pdf
URLhttp://www.r.ensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_02_18_2011.pdf

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.