Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01801841DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01801841

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01801841
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Christian Duvernois Sent: Wednesday, Janua , . To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: LS1 Dear =effrey, I am really sorry to agree with you when you say that "this doesnR=7;t seem to be working", I mean the way we are or rather not communic=ting. The kitchen landing was drawn according to the as-built drawing provided to=me by Shane. While the landing is hidden behind a wall in the 3-d view, it =s apparent on the drawing #T 103- "Terrace view with plants" th=t there is a space left there. It's less visible, and I agree with yo=, can be kind of confusing on the drawing T#102, because of the similar sto=e texture given to the walls of the stairs and of the kitchen building. The stairs should not be a major issue from the kitchen bay since they are =ocated below and on the right side of the kitchen building. With the =uccession of terraces cascading on both sides of the staircase, and with a =arefully chosen planting scheme, the stairs will look fully integrated to t=e landscape and be part of the architectural interest of this part of the i=land. As far as your comment, "To go east before going westR=1; - the design allows the number of steps required to traverse the elevati=n change without encroaching any space upon the road, and to provide also a=direct access to the bicycle parking. It does take more than ten minutes, at least when you are confronted with y=ur drawing board and a desire to provide the best design possible, to make =ven a simple architectural sketch by hand or by computer. Especially when w= are addressing parts of the site that are already existing, such as the fi=st section of the staircase , the kitchen and the master suite buildings. I hope that you will understand that I am not trying to argue with you but =nly to make you realize that those sketches are not absent minded ones but =he result of a serious desire to find an adequate solution to the landscapi=g of this part of your property. As I said before, I do understand and accept your comments and do try=to answer them. But, it's hard to make any progress with this k=nd of non-communication of which I am putting the entire blame on myself. <=R> However in these conditions you will certainly agree with me that I may not=be the right person to work with in regard of the landscaping of little Sai=t James. Very sincerely and with my very best regards. Christian. im sorry„ this doesn;'t seem to be working. your desi=ns are not functional. one has to go east before going west. the view from =he kitchen is teh service entrance, your drawings show no kitchen landing, =the stairs are now a focal point though we discussed repeatedly their disap=earance„ there is no connection to the road and office pavillion„ I asked=that you NOT send me these type of presentation„ it takes your time and is=so clearly not right that a pencil and paper , no more than ten minutes is =equired to find better solutions. EFTA_R1_00143168 EFTA01801841

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.