EFTA01802247

From: jeffrey epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 1:20 AM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LS1 design sketches On plane Sorry for all the typos=.Sent from my i Phone On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Warwick Wic=sman < <mailto: > wrote: =div> We need to review that. =Perhaps after between the entry gallery and the living room. See attached.<=:p> &n=sp; &n=sp; =nbsp; Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal 310.449.5790 =nbsp; &nbs=; &n=sp; Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA <http://www.gensler.=omi> http://www.Gensler.com=/o:p> Click here to view Gensler's 2=10 Annual Report. <http://www.gensler.=om/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf> From: jeffrey eps=ein [[email protected] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:16 PM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LSJ design sketches You could lower pool 2 ft bit if we lower living belo= 59 . How and where do we make the transition ? Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone EFTA_R1_00143974 EFTA01802247 On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Warwick Wicksman «mailt <mailt > wro e: Ok. We can raise the ceiling height in=the living room. A couple of questions: =span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">. &=bsp; How low can we drop the floor elevation of th= living room below +59'? =span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">. &=bsp; Do you have a preferred elevation from what w= sent? =span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">• &=bsp; We can't lower the pool ceiling heigh= too much and fit in the mezzanine access, but we could lower the whole thi=g. Please send us comments on this, and we can u=date the layout to reflect it. Thanks, Warwick = &=bsp; &nb=p; Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal =nbsp; Sinbs=, &nrsp; Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA week. <http://www.Gensler.com> t 5:39 PM Warwick Wicksman « <mailto Jeffrey, > wrote: Attached please find some sketches based on w=at you and Tom reviewed at the Island last Plans ("65 main level", 40=80.G5 lower level", and "G5 mezzanine level", 40=804065 roof"): Please confirm if we are approved to proceed=with this building layout. We need to get the main building going ASAP , and want to release the structural engineer and pool engineer t= move ahead. Tom is still studying the stairs and the exterior elevat=ons; that can continue to develop. But we need to know if the main 40=804,boxes" are set. 2 EFTA_R1_001 43975 EFTA01802248 Exterior Elevations ("elevation s=udy A..." and "elevation study b..."):<=span> These sketches are based on what was discuss=d last week. ="A" includes sloped-roof and f=at-roof version that matches the design of the existing buildings. * ="B" includes a flat-roof miss=on-style concept for the living room, with the two options for the entry bu=lding (one mission, one matching existing). " =Our initial preference is leaning towards the=sloped-roof version of A, but we want to each scheme with you in more detai=. Sections: These show the basic heights, based on the s=oped-roof version of elevation "A". Please review and comment, and let us know i= the floor plans are approved! Thanks, Warwick = &=bsp; &nb=p; Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal =nbsp; &nbs=; &n=sp; Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA http://www.Gensler.co= <http://www.gensler.com/> Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. <http://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_20=0.pdf> <Elevation Study A 1.21-11.PDF> <Elevation Study B 1-21-11.PDF> 3 EFTA_R1_00143976 EFTA01802249 <Option 65 -lower plan.pdf> <Option 65 -mezzanine level.pdf> <Option 65 main level.pdf> <Option 65 -roof plan.pdf> <Option 65 -Section A and B.PDF> <Option 65 main level.p=f> 4 EFTA_R1_00143977 EFTA01802250