Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01802686DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01802686

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01802686
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Joscha Bach < Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 6:45 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Nowak, Martin Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc This is fascinating. Could we get a quantitative measure on the cost of =ndividual brains, with respect to resource consumption and quality =ontrol? The former would be mostly brain size, i.e. how hard it is to =eed it, but also how long it takes to develop and train it. The latter =ould apply to individual differences in intelligence etc. with roughly =he same brain size. Insect societies should be special, because the absence of individual =hances for reproduction removes evolutionary competition between them. =ndividual intelligence benefits the other members, too. In social =pecies where every individual has a chance of reproduction, individual =ntelligence in addition gives an edge over competitors in the same =opulation. Why would mob rule encourage lower intelligence in =ndividuals? We still have competition among the mobsters, so there is =lways an evolutionary pressure towards higher intelligence. Intelligence is a tool for many uses, it may be used for abstract =roblem solving or for power. The latter might imply that being too =ntelligent is dangerous. If an individual is powerful, it might benefit =rom getting rid of competition, especially smarter but currently less =owerful potential rivals. In a species with social dominance =ierarchies, it might be a survival advantage for the vast majority to =e either less smart than the ones in power, or to be smart and totally =isinterested in power. It is tempting to ponder if that could explain =erds, i.e. people with high intelligence but low social skills and =ittle interest in dominance. > Am 18.06.2015 um 06:23 schrieb jeffrey E. <[email protected]>: > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150616215956.htm =eems that as populations grow, indiv intelligence might go down , =s mob rule becomes the norm. Gas a speed measure . might also =ssume that it takes 2 men with iq of something less than 100 to =ccomplish the same task in the same time as an iindiv with an q of lets =ay 100. > -- > please note > The information contained in this communication is confidential, may > be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and > is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of > JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or > any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify us > immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], > and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all > attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00145145 EFTA01802686

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone16215956
URLhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150616215956.htm

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.