EFTA01809662

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 10

Reference

efta-01809662

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

"Barrett, Paul S" jeffrey epstein [email protected]> "Giu rida, David J" < > NRG Bonds Jeffrey B NRG bonds look very interesting. We should buy $1MM of the NRG 7.625% 2018 at ytw 7.50%. B We initiated coverage on the bonds in December with an OW (note attached) B NRG is an independent Power producer (IPP) with a generation blend of 44% nat gas, 33% coal, 16% oil, 5% Nuclear & 2% wind. B67% of Adjusted EBITDA comes from wholesale generation and 33% retail generation.B Think of the product mix as follows; NRG wants high energy prices to sell long term contracts while they want low energy prices for their retail business since they do not pass through cost savings to customers. B Running an asset valuation using very conservative assumptions, our analyst thinks the bonds are well covered with a total asset valuation of $12.4 billion implying 1.4x coverage on the unsecured notes. We estimate NRG generates free cash flow before growth investments, share repurchases, and dividends of $933 million in 2012, $738 million in 2013, and $1.04 billion in 2014. B In the attached note, our analyst said; bThe company compares well to other IPPs in our high yield universe. NRG has the most diversified generation portfolio in terms of both fuel type and generation type (i.e., baseload, peaking, etc.). The company is lower levered than all names but AES and trades 170bp wide to Calpine, with whom it shares similar ratings. We recognize that Calpine trades so tight because of its natural gas portfolio, but think that NRG trades too wide, in relation, given its strong credit profile. We also think NRG should trade more than the current 100bp inside of GenOn given NRGbs stronger credit metrics, balanced somewhat by its slightly lower (as a percentage of debt), but still strong liquidity.b EFTA_R1_00168336 EFTA01809662

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.