To:
Jeffrey
[email protected]]
From:
DS
Sent
Sat 7/20/2013 6:19:44 PM
15 July 2013 Last updated at 18:16
Share this page
Email
Print
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Prince Charles's aide grilled by MPs over tax affairs
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories
e prince uses the duchy to fund his and his wife's public dut
MP presses Charles on Duchy tax
Funding for Prince Charles falls
HMRC 'must fully investigate' Google
The Prince of Wales is not liable to pay corporation or capital gains tax, a senior royal
aide has told MPs on the Public Accounts Committee.
William Nye said the Duchy of Cornwall - which provides the heir to the throne with a private
income - was not a corporation and that the prince voluntarily pays income tax.
Committee chairwoman and Labour MP Margaret Hodge questioned the "fairness" of the tax
arrangements.
The duchy estate is worth £762m.
The prince was paid £19m from the estate last year and paid just over £4m in income tax and
VAT.
EFTA_R1_00447534
EFTA01968060
Mrs Hodge said the committee wanted to "reflect on the current arrangements to see whether
or not they reflect the reality of the world today."
But the royal aide said the prince's estate does not pay capital gains tax because he "doesn't
have access to the capital gains. The capital gains are all reinvested in the duchy for future
dukes".
Mr Nye told MPs the profits were used to pay for the prince's public duties, as well as those of
his wife the Duchess of Cornwall and those of Prince William, the Duchess of Cambridge and
Prince Harry.
He said that if parliament legislated to prevent Prince Charles using his private income in this
way it would cost taxpayers more - to pay for his official duties - and he would be free to spend
his money "on his other things".
'Taxed twice'
Continue reading the main story
What was a medieval entity... has been transformed into a business."
Austin Mitchelltabour MP
Paula Digglc, a senior Treasury official appearing before the committee, defended the prince's
tax arrangements saying that he does not pay capital gains tax because he always reinvests any
profit from sales.
"If the duke were to be taxed on the corporate income of the duchy as well as his income, he
would be taxed twice," she said.
She added that the duchy differed to other corporations because the prince "is in the unusual
position of getting all the income."
The duchy estate of land and property - mostly in the south-west of England - was established
by King Edward III in the fourteenth century to provide a private income for his son and heir to
the throne.
Conservative MPs on the committee defended Clarence House's position that the duchy is in
fact a private estate, not liable to certain taxes.
"If it looks like a private ducal estate set up to provide an heir to the throne and it quacks like a
private ducal estate set up to provide an heir to the throne, can one assume that it might just
possibly be a private ducal estate set up to provide an heir to the throne?", Richard Bacon
asked.
But Labour MP Austin Michell said: "What was a medieval entity... has been transformed into
a business."
EFTA_R1_00447535
EFTA01968061
Force government action
The last time Prince Charles's representatives came before the Public Accounts Committee they
were accused of performing financial "jiggery pokery" and he was said to be the recipient of the
"best housing benefit scheme in the world".
This time the committee is fresh from finding the tax affairs of Google, Starbucks and Amazon
wanting.
Graham Smith, chief executive of the anti-monarchy group, Republic, said: "Everyone has a
moral obligation to pay a fair rate of tax, whether that's Starbucks, Google or the heir to the
throne.
"We welcome the PAC investigation and hope that this exposure of the duchy's tax
arrangements will force the government to act."
Earlier this month, the prince faced calls from Andrew George, the Liberal Democrat MP for
West Cornwall, to "come clean" about the Duchy of Cornwall's tax arrangements.
Clarence House has said public funding for the Prince of Wales fell by £lm to £1.2m in the last
financial year, out of a total income of £20.2m.
On 20 Jul 2013, at 19:05, Jeffrey Epstein <
[email protected]> wrote:
Cell
On Saturday, July 20, 2013, wrote:
When can I call you ?
Subject:
not sure yet, but got a call re i rumor of inquiry in PA taxes?
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
EFTA_R1_00447536
EFTA01968062
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any pan thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00447537
EFTA01968063