Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01996317DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01996317

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01996317
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: jeevacation©gmail.con[[email protected]]; jeevacation mail.com['[email protected]] From: Sent: Tue 1/25/2011 2:59:47 PM Subject: profit Jeffrey, Nick told me that his profit on the projector alone was $6,200 his price to us was $58,500 and he paid 552,300 for the DPI,. according to his last email, I interpret as Nick upgrading to the 3D projector at his cost with no profit to him,. I would like to speak to DPI tech's and find out if the 3D projector displays a better screen since its using a 3D lens capable, which according to Dawn. should be a better picture, since its a higher technology lens..not sure if that is true, but makes sense to me,,,l think you and I agreed that the 3D projector was a brighter sharper display, just my opinion, thanks Larry EFTA_R1_00490911 EFTA01996317

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.