Case File
efta-02010088DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA02010088
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-02010088
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To:
jeevacationftmail.com[jeevacation(ggmail.com]; Jeffrey Epsteinbeeyacation©gmail.com]
From:
drsra
Sent
Tue 1/3/2012 3:44:48 PM
Subject: Re:
Much of the hearing seems normal, except the sidebar in which the Non-Pros Agreement was
discussed. She agrees it is an "inducement" to plea. Pages 43-44 show the factual basis as read
by ASA, but then Jack changes plea and the sentencing begins. In my experience they always
ask the Defendant if they are pleading guilty because they are in fact guilty. Many judges refuse
to allow the Defendant to state he-she is pleading guilty because it is in their best interests to do
so; they have to admit they are guilty. This may seem insignificant, but there could be major
ramifications, especially since the facts and your position are, and apparently always have been,
that you are not guilty of the offenses. The hearing supports an assertion that you followed
advice and pressure from the Feds to accept a fraudulent plea to get it over with. What does the
leagl research show? Seems like you have a basis to reopen your case. The problem is that it
sets aside the Non-Pros Agreement and brings back a possibility of ferderal charges. Given what
is happening with Rothstein, 1 am not sure the Feds what this case opened up.
--- On Mon, 1/2/12, Jeffrey Epstein leevacation@gmaiLcom> wrote:
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
Subject:
To: "drsra"
Date: Monday, January 2, 2012, 7:22 AM
would love to hear you opinion on vacating the plea based on what you have read
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00511216
EFTA02010088
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01682184
186p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01370863
1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown
Medical Record/Clinical Encounter: DOJ-OGR-00026334
This clinical encounter document from the Bureau of Prisons details a medical evaluation of Jeffrey Epstein on July 12, 2019. It covers his medical history, current complaints, and treatment, including discussions around his triglyceride levels, sleep apnea, and back pain. The document was generated by the treating physician at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York.
1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00014087
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02367961
1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01977826
2p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.