Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02025181DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA02025181

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-02025181
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: [email protected]@gmail.com]; Jeffrey Epstienbeevacation©gmail.com] From: Kelly Umekubo Sent Sat 1/22/2011 5:38:00 AM Subject: Mathematician Melvin Dresher ?? I saw this and thought of you again today It was nice to hear your voice today sounding so happy. Happy Birthday J http://bmdawson.com/ Collectibles Sale! Friday -Saturday January 21-22.2011 This is the former home of Mathematician, Melvin Dresher, who worked with the Rand Corporation, and his Peace Activist-wife, Martha. There literally are boxes and file cabinets filled with correspondence, brochures, manifests, newsletters, magazines, programs, fliers, and other related documents dating back to the '50s-'60s-'70s, plus an extensive library of books on historical, political, cultural and contemporary art-related subjects. In 1950, while at Rand, the Polish-born American, Melvin Dresher (1911-1992), working with Rand's Merrill Flood, developed, the game theoretical model of cooperation and conflict known as the "Prisoner's Dilemma". (Albert W. Tucker gave the game its prison-sentence interpretation, and thus the name by which it is known today). Dresher came to the United States in 1923 and earned his Ph.D. from Yale University in 1937. The title of his dissertation was "Multi-Groups: A Generalisation of the Notion of Group." He was the author of numerous RAND research papers on game theory. His widely acclaimed "The Mathematics of Games of Strategy: Theory and Applications" (originally published in 1961 as "Games of Strategy: Theory and Applications") continues to be read today. Dresher's research has been referred to and discussed in a variety of published books, including "Prisoner's Dilemma" by William Poundstone and "A Beautiful Mind" by Sylvia Nasar. EFTA_R1_00532573 EFTA02025181 What's There? There is an extensive collection of art, including original oils, prints, lithos, and numerous books, catalogs, etc. Vintage airplane/car kits, Erector set, Lionel Train parts, tube radios, old trunks, Childrens books, 78-45-331/3 records from jazz to classical. There also is a collection of beautiful shells (some fairly rare), vintage and other jewelry, original contemporary oils and prints and etchings, vintage children's clothes, '50s furniture including a Walnut Acrosonic console piano, sofa, side tables and more contemporary cabinets (built ins), desks and file cabinets, double beds, dressers and book cases. There is a fairly new washer/dryer, small appliances, various kitchen utensils, glassware, linens and other household goods. Sent from my iPhone EFTA_R1_00532574 EFTA02025182

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://bmdawson.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01656066

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726638

173p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01655731

0p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.