EFTA02035531

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 10

Reference

efta-02035531

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

Title: Fw: How shall I respond? —Original Message— From: Hanky, Janis, GOV To: Lesley Groff Sent: Tut Dec 28 II :06:37 2010 Subject: «image001.jpg» Hi Lesley — do you have any details about the flight from Necker Island and St. Thomas? Thanks — Janis Janis L. Hanley Office of Governor Bill Richardson Deputy Chief of Staff - Scheduling, Logistics & Planning State Ca itol Building, Suite 400 Confidentiality Notice: This email, including all attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited, unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this message. PLEASE NOTE: The Governor's schedule is subject to change. Scheduling decisions are not made until 4 or 5 weeks before an event. Do not use the Governor's name on invitations without permission. Check with the Communications Office before issuing a Press Release. EFTA_R1_00548065 EFTA02035531

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown