EFTA02067920

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 10

Reference

efta-02067920

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

To: Lesley Groffi l From: Gallagher. Katherine Van De Mark Sent Thur 11/19/2015 7:15:51 PM Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dec. 5 in Cambridge Hi Lesley, Yes, Martin is looking forward to it! Katherine Gallagher Faculty Assistant Program for Evolutionary Dynamics On 11/19/15, 12:11 PM, "Lesley Groff" < > wrote: >Hello Katherine...Jeffrey has changed his date to come up to Cambridge to >Sat. Dec. 5th Martin be around? >On Nov 17, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Gallagher, Katherine Van De Mark > wrote: » Hi Lesley, >> >> Martin will be available! Do you have an estimated timeframe (e.g. >> lunch/dinner/both)? Ism happy to check with Bob Berwick. >> » All the best, >> • Katherine Gallagher » Faculty Assistant » Program for Evolutionary Dynamics > > >> On 11/17/15, 11:47 AM, "Lesley Groff" < >>> >>> Hello Martin and KatherinegJeffrey is now planning a trip up to >»Cambridge >>> for Friday Dec. 4gwill you be around and available Martin? Jeffrey >>> mentioned he would like to see Berwick also,gmight he be around? >» >» Thanks, Lesley > wrote: EFTA_R1_00624152 EFTA02067920

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02434015

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02577441

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02552492

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA02149215

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.